News

8/11/2017
11:52 AM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

9 of the Biggest Bug Bounty Programs

These programs stand out for the size of their rewards and how much they have paid in total to security researchers in bounties over the last several years.
Previous
1 of 10
Next

Image Source: Rawpixel.com via Shutterstock

Image Source: Rawpixel.com via Shutterstock

Bug bounty programs have become an increasingly popular way for organizations to find and fix vulnerabilities in their software and services.

Until relatively recently it was mainly the software companies and technology firms that employed the tactic.

However, over the last two years or so a growing number of other organizations—such as airlines, automobile companies and financial firms—have begun crowdsourcing their vulnerability discovery via formal bug hunting programs as well.

The primary appeal of these programs is that they give organizations—especially resource strapped ones—a relatively low cost way to discover security holes they might have missed otherwise.

Bug bounty coordination firms such as HackerOne and BugCrowd have both reported widespread interest in their services from organizations across the spectrum. Both maintain rosters of thousands of security researchers.

"We are seeing adoption continue to grow as enterprises are recognizing that bug bounty programs are a key aspect of their security program," says David Baker vice president of operations at BugCrowd.

Just this week for instance BugCrowd announced that it had launched a bug bounty program for a secret customer. What made the announcement significant is the maxium reward of $250,000 that is being offered under the program—one of the highest payouts in the industry. Any researcher can apply for the program but only those selected can participate.

"As the model gains traction, it’s attracted more traditional businesses looking to combat the impact of a growing and changing attack surface and motivated adversaries," Baker says.

Here in no order are some of the top bug bounty programs:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 10
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
What We Talk About When We Talk About Risk
Jack Jones, Chairman, FAIR Institute,  7/11/2018
Ticketmaster Breach Part of Massive Payment Card Hacking Campaign
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  7/10/2018
7 Ways to Keep DNS Safe
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  7/10/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Locked device, Ha! I knew there was another way in.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-15137
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
The OpenShift image import whitelist failed to enforce restrictions correctly when running commands such as "oc tag", for example. This could allow a user with access to OpenShift to run images from registries that should not be allowed.
CVE-2017-17541
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 6.0.0, 5.6.4 and below versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.0.0, 5.6.4 and below versions allows inject Javascript code and HTML tags through the CN value of CA and CRL certificates via the import CA and CRL certificates feature.
CVE-2018-1046
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
pdns before version 4.1.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in dnsreplay. In the dnsreplay tool provided with PowerDNS Authoritative, replaying a specially crafted PCAP file can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, leading to a crash and potentially arbitrary code execution. This buffer overflow ...
CVE-2018-10840
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
Linux kernel is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the fs/ext4/xattr.c:ext4_xattr_set_entry() function. An attacker could exploit this by operating on a mounted crafted ext4 image.
CVE-2018-10857
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
git-annex is vulnerable to a private data exposure and exfiltration attack. It could expose the content of files located outside the git-annex repository, or content from a private web server on localhost or the LAN.