Attacks/Breaches

9/7/2018
05:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apple (Finally) Removes MacOS App Caught Stealing User Browser Histories

The fact that the app likely has been exfiltrating data for years is "rather f#@&'d" up, says the security researcher who reported the issue to Apple one month ago.

Apple has removed a top-rated ad blocker from its official Mac App Store after a security researcher discovered it to be quietly collecting and sending detailed user-browsing histories to a domain based in China.

The $4.99 Adware Doctor was until Friday morning listed as the fourth highest-selling app and top-grossing software product in the category of "paid utilities" in the Mac App store.

Its stated purpose is to protect users from malware and having adware served on their browsers. But the app has also been silently exfiltrating browser histories and other sensitive data from systems on which it is installed, says Patrick Wardle, founder and chief research officer of Digita Security and creator of Objective-See, a website for Mac security tools. 

"It also collects system info, a list of the user's currently running processes, and also certain types of files that users have downloaded. It tries to access the user's App Store history — but I believe a bug causes this to fail," he says.

In a blog post Friday, Wardle said he had contacted Apple about the issue one month ago and informed the company about the app's behavior. Even two years ago, in 2016, another security researcher had raised concerns about the same application trying to trick users into granting it administrative privileges on their devices, he said. But until Friday morning, Apple had not removed the app despite promising to investigate, Wardle said.

"There is rather a MASSIVE privacy issue here," Wardle wrote. "The fact that [the] application has been surreptitiously exfiltrating users' browsing history, possibly for years, is, to put it mildly, rather f#@&'d up!"

Apple did not offer any explanation for why it might have waited so long to act. But according to the company, the app has been removed and the issue, which allowed Adware Doctor to access and exfiltrate privacy-sensitive content like browser history and cookies, has been mitigated in Mojave, the next version of the macOS.

A quick check by Dark Reading shows that the app is indeed no longer available for download from the app store for US users, at least.

Wardle, a macOS security veteran and frequent presenter at major security conferences like Black Hat, said he decided to investigate Adware Doctor after another security researcher tweeted an alert about the application stealing private user files last month.

After purchasing a copy of Adware Doctor, Wardle said he used a combination of static and dynamic analysis and quickly found the application to be behaving in a manner completely inconsistent with its stated purpose. Wardle discovered that when a user gives the application permission — by clicking OK — to remove extensions, cookies, and caches from his or her browser, the app ends up surreptitiously stealing the user's browser history.

Apple apps downloaded from the company's official Mac application stores typically are sandboxed, meaning that it is constrained in the kinds of files and user information it can access, Wardle said.

But since Adware Doctor is a malware detection and removal tool, it needs access to user data and files not normally available to other applications. When the application is first launched, it asks the user for permission to access files in his or her home directory and all files and directories under it so the files can be inspected for malware. Once a user has granted that permission, the tool — like any anti-malware product — has free access to files on the devices.

In Adware Doctor's case, however, the app has been using the access to collect and exfiltrate data. "While some (such as a process list), perhaps have a legitimate reason for being collected by an anti-malware or anti-adware product, others such as the user's browsing history seem to be a blatant violation of the user's privacy," Wardle noted.

According to Apple, the issue has been mitigated in the next release of macOS via a sandboxing mechanism that ensures an app won't be able to access privacy-sensitive content after a user grants it permission to the home directory.

The fact that an app like this was allowed on Apple's official app store — supposedly the most secure source for Mac software — should be a wake-up call for the company, says Matt Lock, director of sales engineering at Varonis.

"This isn't the first time an app has collected data for questionable reasons, and it will not be the last," he says. "The irony is that consumers downloaded the app to reduce adware, but got stuck with spyware in the process."

Related Content:

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec. 3-6, 2018, with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
sopiabrown
50%
50%
sopiabrown,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/25/2018 | 12:38:33 PM
Mac OS based systems
It is really great that in very recent Apple has been removed Mac OS application's history from the browser. It is undoubtedly very fruitful features must be utilized by all the users. They take other details from Apple customer support number to know in advance.
TeroH
50%
50%
TeroH,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/8/2018 | 5:34:04 PM
Still there...
Adware Doctor v1.2 by Li Wenhui is available in Europe. Is this the same app? If it is, then perhaps the other 5 apps from the same vendor should be examined also.
Making the Case for a Cybersecurity Moon Shot
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  2/19/2019
New Free Tool Scans for Chrome Extension Safety
Dark Reading Staff 2/21/2019
Privacy Ops: The New Nexus for CISOs & DPOs
Amit Ashbel, Security Evangelist, Cognigo,  2/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-8955
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
In Tor before 0.3.3.12, 0.3.4.x before 0.3.4.11, 0.3.5.x before 0.3.5.8, and 0.4.x before 0.4.0.2-alpha, remote denial of service against Tor clients and relays can occur via memory exhaustion in the KIST cell scheduler.
CVE-2019-1698
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
A vulnerability in the web-based user interface of Cisco Internet of Things Field Network Director (IoT-FND) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to gain read access to information that is stored on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External E...
CVE-2019-1700
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
A vulnerability in field-programmable gate array (FPGA) ingress buffer management for the Cisco Firepower 9000 Series with the Cisco Firepower 2-port 100G double-width network module (PID: FPR9K-DNM-2X100G) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) conditio...
CVE-2019-6340
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
Some field types do not properly sanitize data from non-form sources in Drupal 8.5.x before 8.5.11 and Drupal 8.6.x before 8.6.10. This can lead to arbitrary PHP code execution in some cases. A site is only affected by this if one of the following conditions is met: The site has the Drupal 8 core RE...
CVE-2019-8996
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
In Signiant Manager+Agents before 13.5, the implementation of the set command has a Buffer Overflow.