Attacks/Breaches

9/5/2017
07:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Data Breach Costs Vary Significantly by Organization

Don't use publicly reported breach costs at other organizations as an estimate for what you might end up paying for a breach, Forrester says.

One of the biggest mistakes that security professionals make when estimating data breach costs is to assume they can use publicly reported costs from breaches at other organizations as a reasonable proxy for their own.

In reality, data breach costs can vary substantially by organization and some of those costs may not even become apparent for several years, analyst firm Forrester Research cautioned in a report released this week. So, when building a business case for investments in data security and operational security, it is better to develop tailored breach estimates instead, Forrester said.

"The biggest misconception is believing that using publicly reported costs from another organization's breach is a reasonable proxy for possible costs for a data breach" in your own organization, says Heidi Shey, the author of the Forrester report.

What's publicly reported in other breaches is typically a subset of measurable short-term costs, such as the cost of investigation and breach notification, she says. They do not always include all other breach-related costs such as those associated with lost employee productivity, regulatory fines, lawsuits, brand damage and recovery, and additional security and audit requirements.

Costs can also vary by the type of data that was compromised. For instance, a breach of customer data or employee data will have very different cost implications compared to breach of intellectual property.

"When organizations think of costs, most of them are the immediate or short-term costs" that typically are incurred in the first six to nine months or so, Shey says.

Firms can overlook some of the squishier, more difficult to measure costs, such as reputation with customers and reputation as an employer. The latter, for instance, could make it more difficult for a breached entity to hire new security staff. Organizations can also often overlook long-term costs, including lawsuits that drag on for years, regulatory investigations that require time and attention to respond to, and settlements such as those with the Federal Trade Commission that can tack on 20 years' worth of audits, Shey says.

When developing a breach estimate, it is better to use a range that shows how different variables can affect the final outcome, rather than a specific number. "The goal," says Shey, "is to understand the factors that influence the costs and move forward the internal discussion about breach impact in a meaningful way."

For instance, use your own estimates as a starting point to show how greater investments in incident response can help minimize breach costs or how delayed notification can increase costs.

The Forrester report identified seven broad direct and indirect cost categories that security professionals need to consider when developing an estimate: response and notification; loss of productivity; lawsuits and settlements; regulatory fines; audit costs; brand recovery costs; and other costs such as higher interest rates because of lower credit ratings after a breach.

For each of these categories, the Forrester report provided an estimated range of the costs that organizations could incur in the event of a breach.

The analyst firm pegged the notification costs for a customer-facing data breach at between $5 and $10 per customer, for example, though it can sometimes be as high as $40 per customer. Forrester estimated hourly rates for incident response services to range between $250 and $550, for public relations and outreach services at between $200 and $500, and for legal services at between $390 and $1,200 per hour.

Forrester's advice on developing customized breach estimates follows a recent report from the Ponemon Institute that showed average breach costs increasing in the US even as it declined elsewhere for the first time in 10 years. The report pegged average breach costs in the US at $7.35 million compared to a global average of just over $3.6 million.

Related content:

 

Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable CISOs and IT security experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation. Click for more info and to register.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
WSJ Report: Facebook Breach the Work of Spammers, Not Nation-State Actors
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  10/19/2018
Good Times in Security Come When You Least Expect Them
Joshua Goldfarb, Co-founder & Chief Product Officer, IDRRA ,  10/23/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-10839
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Qemu emulator <= 3.0.0 built with the NE2000 NIC emulation support is vulnerable to an integer overflow, which could lead to buffer overflow issue. It could occur when receiving packets over the network. A user inside guest could use this flaw to crash the Qemu process resulting in DoS.
CVE-2018-13399
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
The Microsoft Windows Installer for Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.6.1 allows local attackers to escalate privileges because of weak permissions on the installation directory.
CVE-2018-18381
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Z-BlogPHP 1.5.2.1935 (Zero) has a stored XSS Vulnerability in zb_system/function/c_system_admin.php via the Content-Type header during the uploading of image attachments.
CVE-2018-18382
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Advanced HRM 1.6 allows Remote Code Execution via PHP code in a .php file to the user/update-user-avatar URI, which can be accessed through an "Update Profile" "Change Picture" (aka user/edit-profile) action.
CVE-2018-18374
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
XSS exists in the MetInfo 6.1.2 admin/index.php page via the anyid parameter.