Attacks/Breaches

2/8/2018
11:15 AM
50%
50%

Tennessee Hospital Hit With Cryptocurrency Mining Malware

Decatur County General Hospital is notifying 24,000 patients of cryptocurrency mining software on its EMR system.

Decatur County General Hospital (DCGH) in Parsons, Tennessee, recently discovered cryptocurrency mining malware on its its Electronic Medical Record (EMR) server. The hospital began informing 24,000 patients of the attack on January 26.

On November 27, 2017, the hospital received a security incident report from its EMR system vendor, which said unauthorized software, designed to mine cryptocurrency, had been installed on the server supported by the vendor. An ongoing investigation has indicated an unauthorized attacker accessed the server with the EMR system and injected the software.

The hospital's EMR server contained data including patient names, addresses, birthdates, and social security numbers, as well as diagnosis and treatment data. There is no evidence either type of data was taken or viewed, and so far it doesn't seem data theft was the attacker's goal. However, the hospital cannot definitively prove data was not compromised and is therefore notifying patients.

DCGH has not named the EMR system vendor and is offering patients the myTrueIdentity online credit monitoring service for one year. Read more details here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BrianN060
50%
50%
BrianN060,
User Rank: Ninja
2/8/2018 | 5:09:46 PM
Re: you'd assume the EMR data is encrypted
@tmerrem945: sensitive data that leaves a private network should be encrypted.  Data kept within a private network might be encrypted - but anyone (real person or system/application process), that needs access to those data values, has to have the means to decrypt that data. 

So, if an attacker has acquired the necessary credentials,  they'll have the access privileges that go with those credentials. 

Post breech forensics might be able to determine if the attacker used stolen credentials - but that can take time; and breech notification requirements don't always leave enough time for a complete investigation.  
tmerrem945
100%
0%
tmerrem945,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/8/2018 | 1:30:08 PM
you'd assume the EMR data is encrypted
It troubles me that the hospital cannot confirm if the data was taken or viewed.  Had the data been encrypted, then they can be certain the intruder wasn't able to view the information.  
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Number of Retailers Impacted by Breaches Doubles
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer, Dark Reading,  7/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14492
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-21
Tenda AC7 through V15.03.06.44_CN, AC9 through V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN, and AC10 through V15.03.06.23_CN devices have a Stack-based Buffer Overflow via a long limitSpeed or limitSpeedup parameter to an unspecified /goform URI.
CVE-2018-3770
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
A path traversal exists in markdown-pdf version <9.0.0 that allows a user to insert a malicious html code that can result in reading the local files.
CVE-2018-3771
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An XSS in statics-server <= 0.0.9 can be used via injected iframe in the filename when statics-server displays directory index in the browser.
CVE-2018-5065
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Use-after-free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.
CVE-2018-5066
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have an Out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.