Cloud

5/9/2018
11:50 AM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Calculating Cloud Cost: 8 Factors to Watch

If you're not careful and don't regularly assess the impact of your usage, moving to the cloud could have a negative impact on your bottom line.
Previous
1 of 9
Next

(Image: Tanatat via Shutterstock)

(Image: Tanatat via Shutterstock)

The decision to embrace cloud should not be purely based on cost. After all, there are many factors driving cloud adoption, and most aren't based on financial savings but agility, says JP Morgenthal, CTO of Application Services at DXC Technology.

"It's more of an operational concern than a cost concern," he explains, noting that, as you adopt cloud-based infrastructure and applications, what should be top-of-mind is not the price tag but the myriad ways in which the change will affect business processes. People are moving to cloud for improved agility, productivity, and quick access to sophisticated tools, he says, not to save money.

"A few years ago, I would have said most are enabling their business to get to the cloud, trying to save money," adds Robert LaMagna-Reiter, director of information security at First National Technology Solutions. "I think they quickly learned that's not the case."

Moving to the cloud is a process that affects the entire enterprise. So, while cost should not be the sole factor driving adoption, it's something all technology and business leaders will want to keep in mind. Cloud is also complicated with several factors driving the overall price. Consequently, cost reduction is no longer a top driver for cloud adoption. But as you prepare to embrace the cloud, you'll want to know how the change will affect your overall budget, and why.

Let's take a close look at eight common and often unforeseen costs that businesses face as they adopt, and operate in, cloud-based environments. Were there any unexpected costs you encountered as your company shifted to the cloud? Feel free to share in the comments.

 

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 9
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
TimothyE554
50%
50%
TimothyE554,
User Rank: Author
5/14/2018 | 7:57:45 PM
Including security in the cost of cloud
It's great to see security get a mention, but it's not just about the relationship between groups. Security tools need to be adapted to support cloud use cases, just like an organizations applications need to do the same. Tools that are poorly adapted, or that bolt on cloud as an additional use case may drive increased cost. Cloud native security tools might not be the answer either, as having two separate tools for cloud and on-premise security monitoring can drive a different type of unexpected cost.  
6 Ways Greed Has a Negative Effect on Cybersecurity
Joshua Goldfarb, Co-founder & Chief Product Officer, IDRRA ,  6/11/2018
Weaponizing IPv6 to Bypass IPv4 Security
John Anderson, Principal Security Consultant, Trustwave Spiderlabs,  6/12/2018
'Shift Left' & the Connected Car
Rohit Sethi, COO of Security Compass,  6/12/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-12026
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-17
During the spawning of a malicious Passenger-managed application, SpawningKit in Phusion Passenger 5.3.x before 5.3.2 allows such applications to replace key files or directories in the spawning communication directory with symlinks. This then could result in arbitrary reads and writes, which in tur...
CVE-2018-12027
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-17
An Insecure Permissions vulnerability in SpawningKit in Phusion Passenger 5.3.x before 5.3.2 causes information disclosure in the following situation: given a Passenger-spawned application process that reports that it listens on a certain Unix domain socket, if any of the parent directories of said ...
CVE-2018-12028
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-17
An Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in SpawningKit in Phusion Passenger 5.3.x before 5.3.2 allows a Passenger-managed malicious application, upon spawning a child process, to report an arbitrary different PID back to Passenger's process manager. If the malicious application then generates an e...
CVE-2018-12029
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-17
A race condition in the nginx module in Phusion Passenger 3.x through 5.x before 5.3.2 allows local escalation of privileges when a non-standard passenger_instance_registry_dir with insufficiently strict permissions is configured. Replacing a file with a symlink after the file was created, but befor...
CVE-2018-12071
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-17
A Session Fixation issue exists in CodeIgniter before 3.1.9 because session.use_strict_mode in the Session Library was mishandled.