Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

7/26/2019
11:35 AM
50%
50%

FormGet Storage Bucket Leaks Passport Scans, Bank Details

Exposed files include mortgage and loan information, passport and driver's license scans, internal corporate files, and shipping labels.

A cloud security mishap at FormGet has exposed sensitive user-uploaded files dating back to 2013 through a misconfigured Amazon S3 storage bucket, TechCrunch reports. It's the latest company to leave troves of data open to the Internet, signifying a concerningly common trend.

Bhopal, India-based FormGet provides online form creation and email marketing services to around 43,000 customers. People can use its tools to create forms for job applications, online shopping, and other processes. An anonymous security researcher found its S3 bucket had been left online sans password and contacted TechCrunch in an attempt to address the issue.

The bucket contained "hundreds of thousands" of files and documents dating back to 2013, packing a broad range of sensitive user-uploaded files: scans of passports, driver's licenses, paychecks, and Social Security numbers; details of obtained loans and mortgages, bank account statements, and utility bills; UPS shipping labels with names and phone numbers; resumes containing contact information; and internal corporate documents containing cybersecurity assessment notes for multiple banks and financial firms, the report states.

"The problem of misconfigured cloud storage is often exacerbated by trusted third parties," says Ilia Kolochenko, founder and CEO of ImmuniWeb. Businesses often need to share data with vendors like FormGet, which may often prioritize performance over data protection to keep up with a competitive market. Most companies have a vendor risk management policy, he adds, but these are rarely monitored for noncompliance, and few are properly enforced.

Given the frequency at which these data exposures happen, Amazon and other cloud providers have taken steps to lock down storage buckets by default. Businesses storing data in the cloud are urged to double-check their configuration settings to be sure information is private.

Read more details here.

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2019 | 5:35:31 PM
Another S3 bucket issue
There are numerous articles written where vendors and organizations allow actors to compromise S3 buckets with vital information. The vendors can only do but so much, each instance involves the oversight of a person working for the organization who has not been properly trained. This is a pattern that can be mitigated with proper training and experience.

There is a simple way to address this problem, the S3 bucket process involves blocking public access if the user goes to aws.amazon.com | Select S3 | Click the bucket | Click Permissions Tab | Select Block Public Access. Secondly, select "Access Control List" | access for bucket owner | Select the bucket owner (should be a long bucket id to allow access only to this S3 bucket).




Examples of S3 Bucket compromise are listed below (this is not the complete list but it should give you an idea of breaches. 
Attunity
Megacart
TD Bank
Netflix
Ford
UpGuard
Accenture Federal Services

Again, all of these instances could have been mitigated by following best practices provided by AWS (improperly trained personnel or oversight need to be top priority). 

T
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16413
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.0.4. The 9p filesystem did not protect i_size_write() properly, which causes an i_size_read() infinite loop and denial of service on SMP systems.
CVE-2019-3738
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
CVE-2019-3739
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
CVE-2019-3740
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.
CVE-2019-3756
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P3 (6.6.0.3), contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Information relating to the backend database gets disclosed to low-privileged RSA Archer users' UI under certain error conditions.