Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

10/9/2019
12:05 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

FireEye Launches Purple Team Assessments

Purple Team and Continuous Purple Team Assessments enable organizations to quantifiably evaluate security controls and programs against Verodin simulated attack scenarios

WASHINGTON – FireEye Cyber Defense Summit – Oct. 9, 2019 – FireEye, Inc. (NASDAQ: FEYE), the intelligence-led security company, today announced the availability of two new FireEye® Mandiant® services. With Purple Team and Continuous Purple Team Assessments, organizations can now work closely with FireEye Mandiant incident response experts to quantifiably evaluate their security programs against Verodin® simulated attack scenarios.

“Many organizations do not test the efficacy of their security controls and program thoroughly or often enough. Without validation, security teams may base decisions on assumptions rather than evidence, which can instill false confidence in their ability to detect and respond to a security breach,” said Charles Carmakal, CTO of FireEye Mandiant consulting. “FireEye Mandiant Purple Team Assessments combine the best practices from offense and defense so that the organization can quantifiably test and measure their security effectiveness and improve their overall risk posture.”

Red teams simulate attacks and blue teams defend against attacks. Purple team assessments are a collaborative effort among the red and blue teams. Mandiant experts function as the red team and augment an organization’s blue team.

“Our experience with FireEye's Purple Team service offering has been phenomenal. Working hand-in-hand with the Blue Team to detect the different TTPs, helps solidify and uncover new investigative and monitoring methods. In addition to addressing gaps in controls or with use-cases, the engagement serves as a sort of live-fire exercise where analysts can hone their skills. Analysts also learn how to investigate and respond to newer techniques previously unseen or encountered,” said the Senior Information Security Engineer at a Fortune 500 healthcare company.

Purple Team Assessments

With Purple Team Assessments, Mandiant experts guide an organization’s security team through highly-realistic attack scenarios. To simulate the attacks, Mandiant will create scenarios within the FireEye Verodin Security Instrumentation Platform (SIP). The scenarios are based on analysis from the latest data breaches and the most current intelligence regarding industry-relevant threat groups. With that methodology, Mandiant can emulate the tools, tactics, and procedures (TTPs) of hundreds of attackers and simulate any component of the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Throughout the assessment, the organization receives a detailed scorecard that quantifiably identifies where security operations are thriving, areas of improvement, and strategic recommendations to strengthen the security posture.

Continuous Purple Team Assessments Deliver Prolonged Refinement

Mandiant also offers Continuous Purple Team Assessments. Over a prolonged period of 3 - 6 months, an organization’s security team can train and enhance its detection and response capabilities while Mandiant experts use the Verodin platform to execute attacker TTPs. During this hands-on exercise, the security team will engage in periodic re-testing and evaluation to measure and continually refine its capabilities. Mandiant experts will track the progression of the security team’s detection and response capabilities from the start of the engagement to the end, providing quantifiable scorecards along the way to measure the team’s effectiveness. Not only does this practice assess the impact of ongoing changes to people, processes and technology within a security program, it also demonstrates the ROI of the organization’s security spending.

Carmakal concluded, “By integrating the Verodin platform with frontline threat intelligence, we are able to quantify organizations’ security effectiveness in a new and comprehensive way. Purple Team Assessments are just the beginning of how we plan to integrate Verodin into our wider services portfolio.”

For more information about FireEye Mandiant Purple Team Assessments, including the FireEye Verodin Security Instrumentation Platform (SIP), please visit https://www.fireeye.com/services/purple-team-assessment.html

About FireEye, Inc.

FireEye is the intelligence-led security company. Working as a seamless, scalable extension of customer security operations, FireEye offers a single platform that blends innovative security technologies, nation-state grade threat intelligence, and world-renowned Mandiant® consulting. With this approach, FireEye eliminates the complexity and burden of cyber security for organizations struggling to prepare for, prevent, and respond to cyber-attacks. FireEye has over 8,200 customers across 103 countries, including more than 50 percent of the Forbes Global 2000.

© 2019 FireEye, Inc. All rights reserved. FireEye, Mandiant and Verodin are registered trademarks or trademarks of FireEye, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All other brands, products, or service names are or may be trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.

Contacts:

Media
[email protected]

Investors
[email protected]

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.
CVE-2019-20391
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r3 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a bit. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20392
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a list key node, and the feature used is not defined. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20393
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A double-free is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function yyparse() when an empty description is used. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would cause a crash or potentially code execution.