Endpoint //

Privacy

5/25/2018
12:25 PM
50%
50%

Privacy Survey Says: Americans Don't Want to Sell Their Data

A new survey shows the extent to which Americans are reluctant to sell their personal information for any price.

A new study says that many of the assumptions corporations have been making about consumers and their privacy are seriously flawed. And in the new dawn of GDPR, those bad assumptions could have serious consequences.

The study, conducted by digital communications firm Syzygy, surveyed 3,000 adults in the US, UK, and Germany. Asked whether they would sell their private data to a company — even a favored brand — 55% of Americans say that they would not, no matter the price offered.

One of the major surprises in the data came from the question of whether consumers would trade private information for a smoother or more personal online experience. While it is an article of faith for many online companies and services that consumers are happy to make this trade, only 21% of  Americans are willing to do so.

For those who are willing to sell their data to companies, $150 is the median price they would accept. And when it comes to ongoing monitoring of online activity, 33% say they would be willing to let Google watch them Web-surf — in exchange for $25 a month.

For more, read here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 6:02:52 PM
$25 by Google
This would not happen in my view, they may not be making that much money per personal record.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 6:01:17 PM
Re: Surprised?
t paralyzes individuals into never wanting to provide personal data. That is true in my view too. Accessive data collaction is scary.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 5:59:21 PM
Re: Surprised?
Unfortunately, this has been escalated to the point where too much data is acquired needlessly. I agree with this. For facebook more data is better, so result is not that great for the memebers.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 5:57:54 PM
Re: Surprised?
How is this surprising in any way? It is for me partially. We tend to not care about privacy that much if we get something out of it.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 5:56:30 PM
Personal data
It depends what we mean by personl data. If first name, last name and email I think i would sell it with quite low price, knowing that it is out there already.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2018 | 1:16:43 PM
Surprised?
How is this surprising in any way? There are only certain functions that require the use of personal information. Unfortunately, this has been escalated to the point where too much data is acquired needlessly. It paralyzes individuals into never wanting to provide personal data.
Meet 'Bro': The Best-Kept Secret of Network Security
Greg Bell, CEO, Corelight,  6/14/2018
Containerized Apps: An 8-Point Security Checklist
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  6/14/2018
Four Faces of Fraud: Identity, 'Fake' Identity, Ransomware & Digital
David Shefter, Chief Technology Officer at Ziften Technologies,  6/14/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-0291
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
A vulnerability in the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) input packet processor of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause the SNMP application on an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of SNMP protocol ...
CVE-2018-0292
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
A vulnerability in the Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) Snooping feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code and gain full control of an affected system. The attacker could also cause an affected system to reload, resulting in ...
CVE-2018-0293
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
A vulnerability in role-based access control (RBAC) for Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute CLI commands that should be restricted for a nonadministrative user. The attacker would have to possess valid user credentials for the device. The vulnerability is du...
CVE-2018-0294
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
A vulnerability in the write-erase feature of Cisco FXOS Software and Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to configure an unauthorized administrator account for an affected device. The vulnerability exists because the affected software does not properly delete sensitive...
CVE-2018-0295
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
A vulnerability in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) implementation of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition due to the device unexpectedly reloading. The vulnerability is due to incomplete input validation of the BGP update...