Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

11/10/2016
01:00 PM
Ron Teicher
Ron Teicher
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

The Drug Dealer In Your Web Browser

Illicit dealings once isolated to the Dark Web are spilling out into the light.

Drugs, guns, hacking services, and the worst porn you could imagine — they've all long been available in illicit markets on the Dark Web. If you're so inclined, you could also get a complete database of all registered US voters, complete with party affiliation, name, address, phone number, and voting history back to 2000 — all for the low, low price of 12 bitcoins, or about $7,800, based on current exchange rates. And because of anonymous browsing techniques, it's almost impossible for authorities to zero in on the sellers of these items

But the Dark Web — which consists of thousands of underground websites that are usually accessible only via special tools, such as the Tor browser — is bursting at the seams, and its wares have begun to leak out onto the "legitimate" web. Users who know where to look don't have to bother with Tor and other Dark Web mainstays; they can search directly for the items they want, eschewing bitcoins and paying via credit card.

Take the illicit drug industry. Setting up a sales page on a Dark Web marketplace is easy, and instead of restricting sales to a small geographical area, dealers now can sell to the world.

But the problem with the Dark Web is that it requires work. Potential customers must be savvy enough to download and install Tor and have to set up bitcoin accounts to pay for their purchases. That automatically disqualifies a large number of potential customers — technophobes and others who have a hard time following the instructions to order and then pay for goods using a currency that has to be bought and forwarded to dealers.

Out in the Open
Now the process is moving away from the Dark Web. Dealers are moving to the surface web, where they advertise their wares on sites such as Craigslist and online forums like Reddit, providing contact information that leads to chat groups where negotiations are conducted and instructions on payment and shipping are provided. Sites on the Dark Web are even creating YouTube videos that instruct potential customers how to find and connect with them, and there is a surface web search engine that helps guide customers.

Once a customer connects with a seller, it's time to pay, and while bitcoin remains a popular method of payment even on the surface web, a new scam called transaction laundering (TL) is becoming more common, as dealers in underground goods seek to expand their services. In a TL scam, a dealer will set up a website where legitimate-looking products are stand-ins for the “real” goods. It's a form of money laundering in which payments are processed by a legitimate merchant on behalf of another party, knowingly or unknowingly. As shown in the following three real-life examples of TL, the scam is very hard to detect.

In the first TL example, a California-based man set up a legitimate online business as a front for a network of online fraud. He used the company to process transactions for various sites, including many illicit sites, such as phony insurance policies. He also used false advertising to lure customers to sign up and provide their credit card information, and then he collected unauthorized payments, denied services, or closed down his websites completely. When customers complained, the chargebacks were spread between multiple banks so each one separately failed to notice an issue.

The second TL story started in an isolated small town in the Netherlands, where an online flower shop was receiving orders from all over Europe. Actually, the florist was being used as a front to process payments for a site selling marijuana internationally. The criminals used forums, chats, and social media to redirect online shoppers to the drug site.

The third case was more complex, involving a scammer who copied a not-for-profit, open source online video-game platform. However, the scammer ignored the requirement of the original makers of the game not to charge players, copied the version of the game to his own domain (referred to as the fictional name "fungame.com" for this article), and added in-game merchandise such as shields and weapons, and a payment page to purchase this merchandise.

Not realizing that fungame.com infringed on copyright laws, a bank approved fungame.com to process payments. The scammer repeated this action and registered clones of the game under multiple domains with several banks and processors. The scammer then used fungame.com as a front for several other sites. These new domains sold illegal merchandise such as counterfeit goods and drugs, all processed through fungame.com as in-game shopping. There were no players at all — only customers for illegal products.

Authorities have their hands full with cybercrime, but transaction laundering could turn out to be the biggest blow to the credit card system yet. Any illicit transaction can be easily hidden, and detecting these transactions manually is impossible; the only way to do it is through automated big data-based detection systems that can analyze information to look for patterns. Authorities have no choice; TL is a relatively simple trick, but it has dire and brand-damaging consequences. 

Related Content:

Dark Reading's all-day virtual event Nov. 15 offers an in-depth look at myths surrounding data defense and how to put business on a more effective security path. 

Ron Teicher is the CEO and founder of EverCompliant. Ron has served as a CEO of EverCompliant since its inception. Before founding EverCompliant, Ron led the compliance initiatives at Sanctum and Watchfire (acquired by IBM). Watchfire's compliance product won SC Magazine's ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
6 Small-Business Password Managers
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/8/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18986
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 allow attackers to brute-force (guess) valid usernames by using the 'forgot password' functionality as it returns distinct messages for invalid password and non-existing users.
CVE-2019-18981
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks an Access Denied outcome for a certain scenario of an incorrect recipient ID of a notification.
CVE-2019-18982
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
bundles/AdminBundle/Controller/Admin/EmailController.php in Pimcore before 6.3.0 allows script execution in the Email Log preview window because of the lack of a Content-Security-Policy header.
CVE-2019-18985
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks brute force protection for the 2FA token.
CVE-2019-18928
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Cyrus IMAP 2.5.x before 2.5.14 and 3.x before 3.0.12 allows privilege escalation because an HTTP request may be interpreted in the authentication context of an unrelated previous request that arrived over the same connection.