Comments
Avoiding the Ransomware Mistakes that Crippled Atlanta
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
mugsprt
50%
50%
mugsprt,
User Rank: Strategist
4/17/2018 | 8:32:25 PM
Re: System failures
You can tell they really thought that out. :-)
Take Care,

Margaret

 
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/17/2018 | 3:17:56 PM
Re: System failures
Stupid as stupid does ----- and why did Hartsfield Airport in Atlanta  have both primary and secondary power cables router through the same underground tunnel only a few feet from each other when a fire broke out taking about both primary AND REDUNDANT POWER ?????   Because nobody thought it could happen!!!
mugsprt
50%
50%
mugsprt,
User Rank: Strategist
4/13/2018 | 4:53:49 PM
Re: System failures
I agree to use it as a comparison for server failure. The recovery is going to be the same. What is wrong with the City of Atlanta? We as a group know it pretty much the standard best practices. I can't believe the City of Atlanta is that stupid. Now they have outsiders public and private wanting money to solve their problems. They really need to put on their big boy pants and solve it themselves. They will never be ready for the next server failure or attack. Much of the problem needs to solved from within.

I just want to take moment to thank everyone on the posting of this article. I glad we have people still with solid foundation for systems and security.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/13/2018 | 12:10:51 PM
Re: System failures
A better comparison can be made with Merck which was hit hard by WannaCry in 2016.  I remember from all the chatter on the web that they discovered their recovery protocols were about nill!  Which hurt them big time.  YOU have to be able to recover whether from ransomware or drive failure or electrical power outage (Hello, DELTA/).  
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/13/2018 | 10:34:24 AM
Re: System failures
WOW!!!   LIKE I DON'T KNOW THAT?????   I used it as a comparison for server failure.   And the existance of a recovery plan which, from whati can see, does NOT exist in Atlanta.
mugsprt
50%
50%
mugsprt,
User Rank: Strategist
4/13/2018 | 10:17:37 AM
Re: System failures
9-11 had nothing to do with the City of Atlanta. Many of the mistakes were due to the security and the protection of data. I have worked on the inside temporarily. They have a tendency to have shadow IT departments. They are not unified in IT structure of who has control. NO IT GOVERNANCE and no incident response plan. Someone should have been aware of current possible threats like ransomware in general. Who let the media loose with a screen shot of how to contact the cybercriminals is totally stupid because the media contacted cybercriminals for an interview of questions and they asked for money. The security manager should have handled this quietly with the mayor. Controlled and gave the media constructive information. Handle it in the same fashion as the hospitals did before. If the mayor decided not to pay the $51,000 in Bitcoin. Make a plan. Take the infected systems off the network, restore from backup and recover any workstations the same way. Then have meeting with the stakeholders like the mayor and IT director to develop a plan for going foreward. SAMSAM is usually done by phishing attack using an attachment. Time for end user training along with strengthing your security armor. No one can be bullet proof in IT security but you can have a heathly security appetite. 
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/13/2018 | 8:49:33 AM
System failures
17 years ago one morning in September, my data center crashed.  Dropped 103 floors to the ground when the South tower collapsed on THAT DAY.   I was 101st floor so mad eit out though many others did not.  In some ways a Ransomware attack CAN be equivalent to a total system failure.  You had better have a good disaser recovery plan in place and tested!!!!  Upgrading hardware and patching is a NORMAL IT FUNCTION.  It is what the IT staffers are PAID to do and testing a plan is icing on the cake.  It had better be done too because when needed, nobody thinks straight at 2AM rebuilding a server array.   The difference is the exfiltration of data but otherwise they are the same event in many ways.  From what I have heard, THERE WAS NO PLAN and they are rebuilding from ground up.  Horrible.  $3 million in costs to consultants.  
mugsprt
100%
0%
mugsprt,
User Rank: Strategist
4/12/2018 | 1:14:57 PM
Problems is not legacy boxes and out dated applications
I agree with the article to a certain point. Even the oldest software should have been updated. Why? The IT management did not update the software nor move the data to an updated secure platform. Supposedly the City of Atlanta has Cybersecurity manager is also the blame. There is no IT governance to audit the systems and apps to develop risk factors, then resolve them. I BLAME THE PEOPLE. There should be resignations being handed in and termination notices being handed out. The Mayor of Atlanta should be handing down orders to clean this mess up once and for all. I would feel bad for the people let go but there is a huge system to get a security net around and right now they have a lot of companies try to sell the City of Atlanta that they have all the answers.  OUTDATED APPLICATIONS CAN BE PROTECTED. OLD OPERATING SYSTEMS CAN BE HARDED. Read the 2018 Data Base Incident Report from Verizon. Ransomware is climbing on companies or organizations. EASY MONEY. Ransomware sold as service on the dark web. Ransomware is not going away, it will only increase. Now I expressed my opinion. The City of Atlanta will never have updated IT security defense and reasonable protection until they get rid of all the snake oil dealers trying to sell them the latest and greatest cybersecurity package and develop a real cybersecurity plan with a person in charge with the city of Atlanta interest in mind.

Margaret Grigor MCSE,MCSA,CSA,CASP


Higher Education: 15 Books to Help Cybersecurity Pros Be Better
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
Worst Password Blunders of 2018 Hit Organizations East and West
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
2019 Attacker Playbook
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer, Dark Reading,  12/14/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
10 Best Practices That Could Reshape Your IT Security Department
This Dark Reading Tech Digest, explores ten best practices that could reshape IT security departments.
Flash Poll
[Sponsored Content] The State of Encryption and How to Improve It
[Sponsored Content] The State of Encryption and How to Improve It
Encryption and access controls are considered to be the ultimate safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of data, which is why they're mandated in so many compliance and regulatory standards. While the cybersecurity market boasts a wide variety of encryption technologies, many data breaches reveal that sensitive and personal data has often been left unencrypted and, therefore, vulnerable.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-1265
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740.
CVE-2017-1272
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. IBM X-Force ID: 124747.
CVE-2017-1597
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 Database Activity Monitor does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 132610.
CVE-2018-1889
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152080.
CVE-2018-1891
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152082.