Mobile

11/2/2017
01:50 PM
50%
50%

iPhone X Face ID a Facial Biometrics Catalyst?

Apple's new multi-factor authentication technology receives mixed reviews in separate surveys.

Apple's iPhone X is expected to arrive at Apple Stores on Friday, but some security professionals are uneasy about the trustworthiness of its new facial recognition feature.

Facial recognition biometrics has been around for decades but hasn't taken off. But Apple's Face ID in the iPhone X has the potential to spur adoption of facial biometric for multi-factor authentication in the enterprise, akin to how Apple'sTouch ID has spurred fingerprint biometrics in mobile device management systems, security experts say.

Employee adoption of new technology, however, often informs enterprise adoption, experts say.

Meanwhile, two new, separate surveys, show that the degree that end-users and security professionals trust Apple's Face ID is mixed. 

Face ID Faceoff

According to Bitglass's BYOD and Identity report released today - a survey of more than 200 IT and security professionals - 60% have reservations about Apple's Face ID. Top concerns among 40% of respondents include the accuracy of face detection, while 30% worry about its ability to prevent unauthorized access.

"Even though it works similar as Touch ID, everyone has concerns with the new technology," says Salim Hafid, Bitglass project manager. "I expect organizations that allow Touch ID will allow Face ID, but there will be a wait-and-see approach for a lot of organizations."

In addition to the Bitglass survey, other infosec experts in a Wired post recently questioned the security of Face ID. In September, Apple issued a whitepaper on its Face ID technology.

But a majority of end-users, or employees, expect Face ID to be effective for multifactor authentication of users. According to a Secret Double Octopus survey of 522 employees at midsized- to large enterprises, 81% of respondents expect Face ID to be trustworthy in its accuracy in facial recognition.

"We were extremely surprised by these results, since no users have yet tried the iPhone X and used Face ID," says Amit Rahav, vice president of marketing for Secret Double Octopus.

However, 73% of survey respondents say they would prefer the facial recognition feature over passwords in a work environment. That result is comparable to the 70% of respondents who say Face ID will be "extremely or very trustworthy," according to the survey.

Although Face ID may be viewed as viable for multifactor authentication, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in its digital identity guidelines issued earlier this year noted biometrics, in general, should not be used for single authentication. "Biometrics, when employed as a single factor of authentication, do not constitute acceptable secrets for digital authentication — but they do have their place in the authentication of digital identities," the NIST guidelines said.

Mark Clifton, CEO of Princeton Identity, says some efforts are currently underway for incorporating facial recognition in an enterprise environment. "If you look at the past, Apple's Touch ID was a big boom for the biometrics industry," Clifton says. "You see a lot of enterprises and DHS [Department of Homeland Security] doing trials with facial recognition in airports, and of this nature."

Currently, fingerprints are the most popular form of biometric two-factor authentication, but facial recognition is growing fast, followed by iris-recognition, Clifton says. "These modalities will all move forward as consumer come forward and use them."

Ant Allan, a Gartner analyst, says he's skeptical of Face ID's impact on the use of biometrics for multifactor authentication in enterprises.

"I can say that the bottom line is, [Face ID] makes little difference from Touch ID," Allan says. "Whatever its inherent superiority, the lowest common denominator is still the device passcode, which remains as a way of unlocking your iPhone."

That said, however, Clifton says he has seen a change in the past year in the number of mobile users who rely on phone biometrics.

"At a conference I attended a year ago, there were 500 attendees, and when asked how many used the biometrics on their phone, maybe 30% to 40% raised their hand," Clifton recalls. "Now, at the sameconference a couple weeks agowhen asked the same question, 100% said they used it. I think phones have definitely been a catalyst."

Related Content:

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

 

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Researchers Offer a 'VirusTotal for ICS'
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  1/16/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2017
A look at the biggest news stories (so far) of 2017 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape -- from Russian hacking, ransomware's coming-out party, and voting machine vulnerabilities to the massive data breach of credit-monitoring firm Equifax.
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.