Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

10/11/2010
12:21 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Feds Unlikely To Meet Cybersecurity Compliance Deadline

A Nov. 15 date for federal cybersecurity managers to start using the new CyberScope online reporting tool will be missed by many, as 85% have yet to use the new software.




Slideshow: Next Generation Defense Technologies
(click for larger image and for full photo gallery)
While the White House's Office of Management and Budget has set a deadline of November 15 for federal agencies to begin submitting their cybersecurity compliance reports via a new application called CyberScope, rather than with voluminous stacks of paper, 85% of federal cybersecurity managers have yet to use the new software, according to a recent survey.

CyberScope is an automated, interactive reporting portal to support the compliance reporting requirements of the Federal Information Security Management Act. FISMA reporting has long been seen as too arduous and too far removed from operational cybersecurity metrics, but with CyberScope, the government hopes to move toward real-time or continuous monitoring of compliance.

However, a survey by MeriTalk on behalf of several cybersecurity and IT vendors, including ArcSight, Brocade, Guidance Software, McAfee, Netezza, and ImmixGroup, suggests that many federal agencies and IT leaders are not ready for the shift.

In all, only 15% of the high-ranking government IT officials who were surveyed as part of the study in July said they had used CyberScope. While those who had used the tool rated it with an "A" or "B" grade, the rest largely say they don't understand CyberScope's goals and submission requirements.

These findings come despite the fact that CyberScope was introduced in October 2009, that the Department of Homeland Security has been offering CyberScope training, and that top officials like federal CIO Vivek Kundra have repeatedly discussed CyberScope's value in addressing concerns about FISMA.

"November is right around the corner and Feds should realize the value in embracing this new FISMA reporting tool," Tom Conway, director of federal business development at McAfee, said in a statement. "We are working diligently with our federal customers to help leverage their current large investments in security solutions to meet this new compliance mandate."

Of the 85% of survey respondents who hadn't used the tool, 90% don't have a clear understanding of submission requirements, 72% don't clearly understand CyberScope's mission and goals, 69% aren't sure the new approach will result in more secure systems, and 55% believe FISMA reporting costs will actually increase due to CyberScope.

Earlier this year, Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., estimated that FISMA's certification and accreditation process costs the government $1.3 billion annually, with auditing adding another $1 billion. Overall, since 2002, Carper said, the feds have spent more than $40 million on FISMA implementation.

Eventually, the administration wants federal agencies to be able to automatically feed information into the CyberScope tool without the need for manual data entry, but for now, many agencies will save their compliance information via a spreadsheet template and then upload it to CyberScope.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Intel Issues Fix for 'Plundervolt' SGX Flaw
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...