Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Homeland Security Criticized For Potential Privacy Risks

Poor oversight of data mining used in counterterrorism initiatives could leave personal information vulnerable, finds GAO report.

50 Most Influential Government CIOs
Slideshow: 50 Most Influential Government CIOs
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not adequately review the privacy and effectiveness of data-mining systems it uses in counterterrorism efforts, possibly putting personal information at risk, according to a government watchdog agency.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) evaluated six data-mining systems from the DHS and three of its component organizations--the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration--and found that none of them had an effective framework in place for proper oversight of the systems, according to a new report by the agency.

Specifically, the GAO found that none of the systems "performed all of the key activities associated with an effective evaluation framework," according to the report.

[DHS is moving aggressively to implement cloud computing. Learn more about its plans: Homeland Security Plans 12 Cloud Services.]

While four of the programs performed most of the requirements for evaluating privacy, only one performed most of those related to executive review and approval, according to the GAO. This inconsistency puts privacy-related information at risk and also affects the effectiveness of the programs themselves, the agency found.

One system in particular--the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Pattern Analysis and Information Collection (ICEPIC)--was found to be especially troublesome because it was given a privacy impact assessment before the system was even completed, according to the GAO.

Officials developed their assessment of ICEPIC before a component called the law Enforcement Information Sharing Service--which allows people's personal information to be shared outside the agency--was put in place, according to the GAO. As a result, multiple law-enforcement agencies have access to people's personal information, but it's not being reported or disclosed, which could put that information at risk.

In the DHS' defense, the GAO said that officials are working to revise the privacy assessment plan to take into account the feature, but that plan is not yet complete.

As one of several recommendations in the report, the GAO advised the DHS to develop "requirements for providing additional scrutiny of privacy protections for the sensitive information systems that are not transparent to the public through privacy impact assessments."

The DHS did not respond immediately to request for comment about the report Monday.

The federal government has ramped up its data-mining efforts recently to improve how it uses the tool, particularly in its review of intelligence information to thwart terrorist activities. The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), for example, is developing software called DataSphere that can analyze terrorists' communications networks and travel activities to help discover relationships among them.

Data mining and analytics are also are key to efforts the feds are taking to cut costs, according to the Obama administration's Campaign to Cut Waste. Officials believe that by examining and analyzing existing data they can decide how to prioritize their investments.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
Google Lets iPhone Users Turn Device into Security Key
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/15/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5647
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
The Chrome Plugin for Rapid7 AppSpider can incorrectly keep browser sessions active after recording a macro, even after a restart of the Chrome browser. This behavior could make future session hijacking attempts easier, since the user could believe a session was closed when it was not. This issue af...
CVE-2011-3612
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in panel.php in UseBB before 1.0.12.
CVE-2011-3613
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue exists in Vanilla Forums before 2.0.17.9 due to the way cookies are handled.
CVE-2011-3614
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An Access Control vulnerability exists in the Facebook, Twitter, and Embedded plugins in Vanilla Forums before 2.0.17.9.
CVE-2011-3621
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A reverse proxy issue exists in FluxBB before 1.4.7 when FORUM_BEHIND_REVERSE_PROXY is enabled.