Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/13/2011
01:58 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Mobile Security Needs Executive Involvement

IT managers need a plan for managing a highly variable fleet of devices through mobile device management, according to panelists at InformationWeek Analytics Live sessions at Interop 2011.

If you missed the InformationWeek Analytics Live sessions at Interop 2011 in Las Vegas, a UBM TechWeb event, you definitely want to check out the slides--there's a huge wealth of information that you can use when you are preparing to discuss mobility with executives.

Below are some of the salient points that you may want to consider from the consumerization and midmarket mobility and security presentations.

-- The next time that you start talking mobility strategy, you might want to grab the graphically presented stats that Grant Moerschel, analyst and VP of Wavegard, got from Infonetics Research. They clearly show, in an objective manner, the staggering growth trend of mobile devices. For executive business management or IT staffs to ignore such a trend would be foolhardy.

-- According to analyst Mike Davis, who is also CEO of Savvid Technologies, "platform fragmentation makes effective risk reduction and management just about impossible without a heterogeneous device management platform." In other words, IT needs to know that standardizing devices is going to be impossible, and has to plan for managing a highly variable fleet of devices through mobile device management (MDM). We had strong agreement on this. A riff on this that I threw into the mix that I've learned from other IT leaders is that you really want to bundle the cost of MDM into the ongoing opex of the device. That is, nobody's going to give $50,000 annually to IT to run MDM, but it is relatively simple to negotiate with business units to pay $5 to $15 a month on top of their mobile bills, especially when you explain the benefit.

-- There's some disagreement, even within our ranks, about the desirability to focus on remote-control tools as the primary way that users interface with corporate data. Others say that this secures the device, with no data at rest. I say, sure, that's true, but it completely ignores the reason that the device was purchased in the first place: a truly mobile user interface, simpler apps, ability to work offline via cloud file sync tools, quicker access from the time you turn it on to the time you get work done. If folks wanted Windows, they'd buy netbooks, not iPads or Android tables. Ever try to right click from a tablet?

-- More than ever, IT folks are trying to wrap their arms around this realization that they can't do it alone. In the same way that ERP projects fail without executive involvement, I believe that mobility initiatives won't work without some level of executive involvement. Davis did a nice job of laying out the threat environment--everything from GSM being cracked, to defects in kernel code, to malicious apps from the app store that surreptitiously call Russian pay-by-the-minute numbers or send SMS messages that result in extra charges on your phone bill. Execs need to be educated regarding the threat environment. But so do end users. Davis said that he's had a lot of success in compliance when he educates folks that basic security practices not only protect the corporation, these practices also protect the employee's photos, personal information, and in some cases, personal finances.

Jonathan Feldman is a contributing editor for InformationWeek and director of IT services for a rapidly growing city in North Carolina. Write to him at [email protected] or at @_jfeldman.


Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
Google Lets iPhone Users Turn Device into Security Key
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/15/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5647
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
The Chrome Plugin for Rapid7 AppSpider can incorrectly keep browser sessions active after recording a macro, even after a restart of the Chrome browser. This behavior could make future session hijacking attempts easier, since the user could believe a session was closed when it was not. This issue af...
CVE-2011-3612
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in panel.php in UseBB before 1.0.12.
CVE-2011-3613
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue exists in Vanilla Forums before 2.0.17.9 due to the way cookies are handled.
CVE-2011-3614
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An Access Control vulnerability exists in the Facebook, Twitter, and Embedded plugins in Vanilla Forums before 2.0.17.9.
CVE-2011-3621
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A reverse proxy issue exists in FluxBB before 1.4.7 when FORUM_BEHIND_REVERSE_PROXY is enabled.