Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

9/10/2009
04:26 PM
Gadi Evron
Gadi Evron
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Blacklisting For Extra Mail Server Security

A majority of systems around the world use Internet blacklists as lists of IP addresses that are most likely compromised -- by bots -- and used by these systems to block or otherwise filter email. However, these lists can sometimes be used beyond the blacklist's design intent for increased security, but only after careful consideration.

A majority of systems around the world use Internet blacklists as lists of IP addresses that are most likely compromised -- by bots -- and used by these systems to block or otherwise filter email. However, these lists can sometimes be used beyond the blacklist's design intent for increased security, but only after careful consideration.By filtering with a blacklist, millions of email servers worldwide manage to stay operational. At the same time, email remains a viable communication medium in spite of the load spam emails put on the infrastructure.

There's never a good time to discover you can't use email, especially while flying around the world on business. This recently happened to me: I was unable to send email, and the error message baffled me. It claimed my IP address was listed in a certain blacklist.

Blacklisting is supposed to be enabled only for other servers trying to connect to mine, so why was the server blocking me, a user, when I authenticated and tried to email?

Turns out the problem was due to a configuration error. But I liked it -- the bug became a feature. One that can be dangerous, though. Find out the acceptable use policy of the blacklist provider for non-standard use like this, and comply with all requirements. For example, the CBL's terms of use are here: http://cbl.abuseat.org/tandc.html.

Because I'm among very few users using this server, the inconvenience was negligible. If I am willing to not email while connecting via insecure networks, then I gain an extra layer of security.

Millions of bot-infected computers are far less likely to be successful in compromising the server because they can't access much of its functionality. Given that most Internet attacks are performed via bots, I feel this raises the security level of the server at the price of being inconvenienced when on the road.

I cannot IP filter an SMTP server to be available only from certain locations -- as if I even wanted to limit myself in such a way. By its very nature as a public service, it needs to be available to the world if I am to receive email from others. And this extra security helps increase my assurance level.

This solution won't work for everybody. Perhaps you are not willing to inconvenience yourself, or perhaps you use a busier server and can't decide on such a measure for the other users. Indeed, for a busy server such as a service provider's, it will simply cause too much problems. But it works for me.

Of course, there are many varied solutions for secure email, from authentication and encryption to using VPN. This only complements them for me under my specific condition of being almost the sole user of this server.

Naturally, this cannot, nor should it, be implemented on email servers with more than just a few users, and existing solutions are more than enough for most. Be careful not to implement it lightly, as it can cause many misconfigurations down the road.

For a view on this from the perspective of a DNSBL operator, see http://cbl.abuseat.org/wrong.html. For further reading on email security, I'd like to direct you to MAAWG's Managing Port25 document.

Follow Gadi Evron on Twitter: http://twitter.com/gadievron

Gadi Evron is an independent security strategist based in Israel. Special to Dark Reading. Gadi is CEO and founder of Cymmetria, a cyber deception startup and chairman of the Israeli CERT. Previously, he was vice president of cybersecurity strategy for Kaspersky Lab and led PwC's Cyber Security Center of Excellence, located in Israel. He is widely recognized for ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "This is the last time we hire Game of Thrones Security"
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4428
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM Watson Assistant for IBM Cloud Pak for Data 1.0.0 through 1.3.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session....
CVE-2019-4611
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 168519.
CVE-2019-4612
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to malicious file upload in the My Account Portal. Attackers can make use of this weakness and upload malicious executable files into the system and it can be sent to victim for performing further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 168523.
CVE-2019-4621
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM DataPower Gateway 7.6.0.0-7 throug 6.0.14 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.5 have a default administrator account that is enabled if the IPMI LAN channel is enabled. A remote attacker could use this account to gain unauthorised access to the BMC. IBM X-Force ID: 168883.
CVE-2019-19230
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability exists in CA Release Automation (Nolio) 6.6 with the DataManagement component that can allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.