Risk

11/14/2018
11:15 AM
50%
50%

Can Businesses Stand Up to Cybercrime? Only 61% Say Yes

While 96% of US organizations say business resilience should be core to company strategy, only 61% say it actually is.

New data points to a gap between how businesses value resilience and how they implement it, Tanium researchers report.

As part of The Resilience Gap study, Tanium polled 1,000 US business decision makers to learn more about their ability to defend against cybercrime. Nearly all (96%) believe making technology resilient to business disruptions should be core to their broader strategy. However, only 61% report that resiliency is actually in place.

There remain several barriers to achieving business resilience, researchers found, specifically between internal organizational structures and access to technology and talent. More than one-third (36%) say growing complexity is to blame; 20% blame siloed business divisions. One-third say the problem is with hackers becoming more sophisticated than internal IT teams, and 17% claim their company doesn't have the right skills to accurately detect breaches in real time.

Companies need to assign responsibility for business resilience, report researchers, who explain that one of the reasons it remains unachievable is because of growing internal confusion on where the responsibility lies. But who should handle it? Some respondents say the CIO or head of IT should take charge, 33% say all employees should be responsible, and 10% say the CEO.

Poor business resilience comes with financial consequences. Thirty-two percent say they could not — or don't know if they could — calculate the impact of a breach when considering lost revenue and productivity. Eleven percent report they don't know if they could calculate response cost; 10% don't know if they could calculate the impact of lost or exposed data.

Read more details here.

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec. 3-6, 2018, with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10014
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-24
In DedeCMS 5.7SP2, member/resetpassword.php allows remote authenticated users to reset the passwords of arbitrary users via a modified id parameter, because the key parameter is not properly validated.
CVE-2019-10015
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-24
baigoStudio baigoSSO v3.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the first form field of a configuration screen, because this code is written to the BG_SITE_NAME field in the opt_base.inc.php file.
CVE-2019-10017
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-24
CMS Made Simple 2.2.10 has XSS via the advanced_search.php Name field, which is reachable via an "Add a new Profile" action to the File Picker.
CVE-2019-10010
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-24
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the PHP League CommonMark library before 0.18.3 allows remote attackers to insert unsafe links into HTML by using double-encoded HTML entities that are not properly escaped during rendering, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-20583.
CVE-2019-9978
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-24
The social-warfare plugin before 3.5.3 for WordPress has stored XSS via the wp-admin/admin-post.php?swp_debug=load_options swp_url parameter, as exploited in the wild in March 2019. This affects Social Warfare and Social Warfare Pro.