Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

6/2/2009
10:20 AM
David Maynor
David Maynor
Commentary
50%
50%

Java Trouble Brewing For Apple

Like most computer geeks with the latest toys, I can always find a way to play rather than work. My procrastination tendencies can sometimes lead to troubling results (just ask my girlfriend), so I often give vendors some leeway when it comes to patching vulnerabilities. But some vendors just don't get it.

Like most computer geeks with the latest toys, I can always find a way to play rather than work. My procrastination tendencies can sometimes lead to troubling results (just ask my girlfriend), so I often give vendors some leeway when it comes to patching vulnerabilities. But some vendors just don't get it.Patching vulnerabilities is never as easy as changing a line of code and recompiling. Vendors that integrate open-source projects have an even harder problem because the details of a flaw might be fixed in a source tree long before they are able to bundle a fix and get it into users hands. I call this window between an open-source project fixing a security program and a commercial vendor that deploys the open-source code applying the patch the "window of owning." Basically, you get free bugs if you keep track of what open-source project is patching what and who it affects.

Apple traditionally has a huge "window of owning." A quick look at the number of open-source and third-party apps that go into OS X shows a consistently large opportunity for exploiting OS X users. (While you may be inclined to chalk my thoughts to prior disagreements with Apple, you would be wrong -- and your Mac would remain open to this vulnerability).

A Java vulnerability making recent headlines has given attackers a great chance to use and abuse Mac users worldwide: Landon Fuller published details of a flaw that has long since been fixed in Java, but has yet to be fixed in OS X. The flaw, CVE-2008-5353, was fixed by Sun back in January. This affects OS X users because Apple integrates Java and has yet to make the patch available to its users.

Make no mistake: This bug is trivial to exploit and has a devastating effect. The example Fuller offers on his Website harmlessly uses the "say" command to inform a user that he is vulnerable. This isn't a case of a vulnerability being hyped and not actually dangerous. Because of the design and implementation of Java, many of the security features Apple added to OS X -- like a Non-eXecutable (NX) stack and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) -- have no effect in stopping this exploit.

An attacker with a bit of knowledge could make your OS X machine download a rootkit, start or stop processes, add users, and steal information. These are attacks Mac users generally think they are immune to.

Last year at Defcon, Rob Graham and I discussed how to set up a spear-phishing site that is the first part of a remote penetration test. Since this OS X vulnerability requires no user interaction, works with Firefox and Safari, and gives access to the file system, it's the perfect exploit to use to get a foothold into a network. The best part is if the site is hosted over SSL, none of the perimeter protection will be able to detect the attack. This exploit is a pen tester's Christmas present.

So what's the solution? You can disable Java, but a lot of applications in the enterprise need Java to work. You could try and not visit any Websites, but the way this vulnerability is manifested in OS X, there are plenty of ways to get to it. The only real solution is Apple releasing a patch, but as of today that patch is a little more than four months behind. At this rate, by the time Apple patches the vulnerability, there will probably be another vulnerability that attackers can take advantage of. Happy surfing!

David Maynor is CTO of Errata Security. Special to Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
6 Small-Business Password Managers
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/8/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-11931
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
A stack-based buffer overflow could be triggered in WhatsApp by sending a specially crafted MP4 file to a WhatsApp user. The issue was present in parsing the elementary stream metadata of an MP4 file and could result in a DoS or RCE. This affects Android versions prior to 2.19.274, iOS versions prio...
CVE-2019-18980
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
On Signify Philips Taolight Smart Wi-Fi Wiz Connected LED Bulb 9290022656 devices, an unprotected API lets remote users control the bulb's operation. Anyone can turn the bulb on or off, or change its color or brightness remotely. There is no authentication or encryption to use the control API. The o...
CVE-2019-17391
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
An issue was discovered in the Espressif ESP32 mask ROM code 2016-06-08 0 through 2. Lack of anti-glitch mitigations in the first stage bootloader of the ESP32 chip allows an attacker (with physical access to the device) to read the contents of read-protected eFuses, such as flash encryption and sec...
CVE-2019-18651
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 3xLogic Infinias Access Control through 6.6.9586.0 allows remote attackers to execute malicious and unauthorized actions (e.g., delete application users) by sending a crafted HTML document to a user that the website trusts. The user needs to have ...
CVE-2019-18978
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
An issue was discovered in the rack-cors (aka Rack CORS Middleware) gem before 1.0.4 for Ruby. It allows ../ directory traversal to access private resources because resource matching does not ensure that pathnames are in a canonical format.