Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/24/2019
02:30 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

NormShield Enables Organizations to Calculate Potential Financial Impact of Cyberattacks on Suppliers, Partners

VIENNA, VA, September 24, 2019 – No matter how hardened a company’s cyber defenses are, significant risk remains when suppliers and third-party trading partners are attacked and compromised. Today, NormShield, the only provider of a standards-based external cyber risk assessment platform, unveiled the first-ever automated tool to combine and assess both cyber and financial risk.

Calculating the dollar value of the probable loss caused by an attack on a supplier or partner enables Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs), Chief Risk Officers (CROs) and Chief Financial Officers (CFO) to measure and mitigate cyber risk to business performance.

To measure the potential financial impact (risk) to an organization, NormShield uses the Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) Model, the only international standard Value at Risk (VaR) model for cybersecurity and operational risk.

“Incorporating the FAIR Model into cyber risk assessments enables organizations to effectively quantify the true financial cyber risk to their bottom lines,” said Mohamoud Jibrell, CEO of NormShield. “Companies now can have a three-dimensional view of the technical, compliance and financial impact of a cyberattack to better understand the full risk relationship with a partner or supplier. For some, the business benefits will outweigh the cyber risks but for others it may not.”

In financial services, for example, CISOs and CROs will be able to show the business that the threat of an attack on a vendor is real and gauge whether the odds are rising or falling. Further, CISOs and CROs can now show the business the financial impact of sharing fewer records with a vendor. The business can then determine which is greater, the reduction in probable costs from an attack on that vendor or the increase in revenue from sharing more records with that vendor.

A company’s vendors have different levels of importance. A vendor that does not have access to any systems or confidential data will have lower risk than that of a vendor that has access to PII data of company employees. The FAIR model allows NormShield to give a vendor business impact (Loss Magnitude) in risk calculation – from both the technical and financial perspectives.

“Every dollar spent on cyber risk management is a dollar that can’t be spent growing the business or addressing other organization imperatives,” said Jack Jones, chief risk scientist for RiskLens. “Consequently, cost-effective cyber risk management — knowing what matters most, and getting the best bang for your risk management buck — is a necessary cornerstone of organization success.”

The FAIR methodology was conceived as a way to provide meaningful measurements to satisfy management's desire to make effective comparisons and well-informed decisions. FAIR has become the only international standard Value at Risk (VaR) model for cybersecurity and operational risk.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
6 Small-Business Password Managers
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/8/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18986
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 allow attackers to brute-force (guess) valid usernames by using the 'forgot password' functionality as it returns distinct messages for invalid password and non-existing users.
CVE-2019-18981
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks an Access Denied outcome for a certain scenario of an incorrect recipient ID of a notification.
CVE-2019-18982
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
bundles/AdminBundle/Controller/Admin/EmailController.php in Pimcore before 6.3.0 allows script execution in the Email Log preview window because of the lack of a Content-Security-Policy header.
CVE-2019-18985
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks brute force protection for the 2FA token.
CVE-2019-18928
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Cyrus IMAP 2.5.x before 2.5.14 and 3.x before 3.0.12 allows privilege escalation because an HTTP request may be interpreted in the authentication context of an unrelated previous request that arrived over the same connection.