Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

11/20/2009
12:00 PM
Gadi Evron
Gadi Evron
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Scrutinizing The White House Cyberspace Policy Review

A lot was expected of the White House Cyberspace Policy Review, but like in previous cases, disappointment is what we find.

A lot was expected of the White House Cyberspace Policy Review, but like in previous cases, disappointment is what we find.Even so, this is an important document. The fact that the Obama administration has taken the time to perform the review upgrades the importance of cybersecurity in the eyes of other governments. And as was pointed out to me, the 100 documents submitted to the review for making the final report are important on their own, and their content is invaluable.

But what of the final report?

When I saw the much-anticipated policy review was released and downloadable from the White House Website (PDF), I have to admit I was excited. While I did not expect to find any drastic changes proposed -- it is a policy review, after all -- I was still disappointed.

Expecting the document to discuss past failures or specific plans was out of the question, but general ideas as to where the country should go and where funding should follow was what I genuinely believed I would read. My naivete soon became apparent.

The document is a to-do list of vague milestones. It discusses what needs to be done in order for the administration to have an idea about what to do. Why 78 pages? If there is a lot to read, then people might fail to see the lack of actual content.

When I voiced my concerns on the Funsec mailing list asking if I could simply be misunderstanding, a friend who shall remain nameless quickly corrected me. They plan to do quite a bit. In fact, they plan to, tongue-in-cheek:

- Appoint someone - Do more study - Create a priority - Appoint someone else - Form a committee - Advertise - Create ideas that might, someday, become policies - Tell business to get interested in doing this for you - Create a framework to develop an infrastructure of some type - Have a vision

Smart people in high places may respond and say in good tradition: "A lot is happening behind the scenes, you simply don't know of it." That is quite possible. But judging from past experience, seeing is believing.

The Internet has been running on good faith and trust-based relationships for years now, operated by technical folk with no interest in policy, and saved by volunteer fire brigades who don't know how to speak policy. The entire cybersecurity review document can be translated into stalling for time and in college debate tradition, arguing for maintaining the status quo.

Who are we to argue?

Follow Gadi Evron on Twitter: http://twitter.com/gadievron

Gadi Evron is an independent security strategist based in Israel. Special to Dark Reading. Gadi is CEO and founder of Cymmetria, a cyber deception startup and chairman of the Israeli CERT. Previously, he was vice president of cybersecurity strategy for Kaspersky Lab and led PwC's Cyber Security Center of Excellence, located in Israel. He is widely recognized for ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Lessons from the NSA: Know Your Assets
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  12/12/2019
4 Tips to Run Fast in the Face of Digital Transformation
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  12/9/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...