Threat Intelligence

At RSAC, SOC 'Sees' User Behaviors

Instruments at the RSA Security Operations Center give analysts insight into attendee behavior on an open network.

RSA CONFERENCE 2018 – San Francisco – At RSAC 2018 the SOC is a demonstration site. It has some hard limits — no visibility to the external IP interfaces being the most significant — but it has tremendous visibility into what happens on the wireless network that supports the tens of thousands of attendees using the open system. And that network visibility translates into great visibility into the behavior of network security professionals in the wild.

A team of network security specialists including Cisco's Jessica Bair staff the SOC, watching traffic of various sorts flow to and from the devices carried by attendees, exhibitors, and staff. Because the SOC isn't blocking any traffic, there's great interest in the monitoring, which happens courtesy of RSA NetWitness Packets; potentially malicious traffic is further given static analysis by Threat Grid.

One of the things visitors notice in the SOC fishbowl is a screen filled with a rolling list of partially obfuscated passwords. That's when they see two important things about conference attendees, one of them good, one of them not so much.

Almost all of the passwords are either strong or very strong. That's great, and shows that security professionals, at least, have acted on the need for stronger passwords.

The problem comes in the fact that the passwords can be seen to be strong; they're being sent in clear text. It's a sign of a lesson half-learned and indicative of problems likely to plague all levels of the computer-using population of companies.

And passwords aren't the only data being sent in the clear. Other examples of documents analysts have seen traversing the network include business plans, resumes, and information on competitors, according to one of the engineers staffing the SOC. 

While the passwords and documents traversing the network represent a significant security risk, Bair quickly points out that there is no threat of long-term information release; the hard disks from the monitoring and analysis appliances are crushed at the end of the conference.

Of course, the monitoring infrastructure established in the SOC sees more that just potentially embarrassing clear text documents. Malware and possible malware were identified and analyzed through Cisco's Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) Anywhere with its Threat Intelligence Cloud. Information on potential malware seen was communicated among all nodes of the security network and other security networks related to the RSA Conference infrastructure for more rapid identification and (potential) remediation.

Ultimately, Bair likened the activity of the SOC to the basic instruction given to fighting women and men of the U.S. Army. "You have to do three things: Shoot, move, and communicate. If you're not doing all three three, you're [redacted] dead."

In cybersecurity terms, the system must actively defend the organization's assets, be agile in shifting its activities to meet evolving threats, and share information and commands with other networks looking for malware and malicious behavior. With all three, an organization has a chance to practice effective behavior. Without the three, then sooner or later your organization is truly [redacted] dead.

Related content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for a two-day Cybersecurity Crash Course at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the agenda here. Register with Promo Code DR200 and save $200.

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Valentine's Emails Laced with Gandcrab Ransomware
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
High Stress Levels Impacting CISOs Physically, Mentally
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/14/2019
Mozilla, Internet Society and Others Pressure Retailers to Demand Secure IoT Products
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7164
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-20
SQLAlchemy through 1.2.17 and 1.3.x through 1.3.0b2 allows SQL Injection via the order_by parameter.
CVE-2018-20025
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Use of Insufficiently Random Values exists in CODESYS V3 products versions prior V3.5.14.0.
CVE-2018-20026
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Improper Communication Address Filtering exists in CODESYS V3 products versions prior V3.5.14.0.
CVE-2018-9867
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
In SonicWall SonicOS, administrators without full permissions can download imported certificates. Occurs when administrators who are not in the SonicWall Administrators user group attempt to download imported certificates. This vulnerability affected SonicOS Gen 5 version 5.9.1.10 and earlier.
CVE-2019-5780
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Insufficient restrictions on what can be done with Apple Events in Google Chrome on macOS prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a local attacker to execute JavaScript via Apple Events.