Threat Intelligence
5/10/2017
03:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Businesses Not Properly Securing Microsoft Active Directory

Businesses overlook key security aspects of AD, leaving sensitive data open to external and internal attacks, new study shows.

Microsoft Active Directory (AD) often lulls enterprises into a false sense of security. Many are so confident in the system's security measures they neglect to put the right safeguards in place.

A new survey conducted by Skyport Systems polled more than 300 IT professionals in North America and discovered AD security is lacking at most companies despite their relative confidence in how they're managing AD security.

More than half said their AD is "secure" or "very secure," and more than one-third of the remaining 50% said it was "moderately secure." Only 2.5% of respondents said their AD was "not secure."

But mismanagement of AD unknowingly exposes 90% of enterprises to cyberattacks, Skyport discovered in its AD security assessment for enterprises in 2016. Organizations often fail to see the danger. More than half of respondents either said AD security is not a priority for the coming year, or they are unsure if it will be.

"The challenge with AD is a long-term historical one," explains Michael Beesley, CTO of Skyport Systems. "When it was first architected and designed, the open hybrid enterprise was not even imagined."

Microsoft initially intended for AD to be a closed internal system, hidden from attackers, he continues. The rise of shadow IT, advanced phishing attacks, and open hybrid enterprise IT architectures led to its exposure in most organizations. 

AD is increasingly vulnerable as adversaries seek administrator credentials and workstations. If stolen, the credentials stored inside Microsoft AD could provide "super user access" to all enterprise IT systems regardless of their location. Attackers can also disguise their actions as legitimate administrator activity and stay within the environment indefinitely, avoiding all attack-detection mechanisms.

"It is the repository of master keys, able to open every other lock," Beesley says of the system. "All information, sensitive or not, is at risk … everything becomes at risk when AD is owned by the cyberattacker."

This data may include customer databases, financial information like credit card and account data, personal information, healthcare information, business intellectual property, business planning data, and other valuable files, he continues.

AD Neglect

Despite their belief that they've locked down AD sufficiently, 70% of respondents actually neglect to implement multi-factor authentication, and 41% let unspecified workstations access domain controllers. More than 20% used admin credentials to read email or surf the Web.

Neglecting to provide secure access workstations for administrators is a recommended best practice from Microsoft, Beesley notes, but almost no businesses do it. The same can be said of not running the AD domain controllers on secure, isolated infrastructure.

Most businesses are "dramatically overstating" their confidence in their AD security, he says. Because AD has been around for a long time, many IT and security teams forget how valuable its information is.

Further, he continues, most businesses don't realize how open they are, and how easily an attacker can access the internal environment where AD is located through phishing attacks, malware insertion, or malicious USB drives. Most don't even realize they are targets.

"You no longer need to be large, or strategic, or controversial, to get a hacker's attention," he says. "Any business today is a prime and profitable target for an attacker as their costs are low, automation is high, and their risk is very low."

There are several steps organizations can take to protect themselves as AD is targeted. Beesley recommends continually cleaning up AD configurations, groups, and administrative users, and installing and using secure access workstations for admins.

He also advises all businesses to run AD domain controllers on isolated, secure, and measured infrastructure with visibility around each domain controller. In addition, larger organizations should deploy a more secure "red forest" administrative domain to safeguard high-level accounts responsible for managing production AD domains.

Related Content

Kelly Sheridan is Associate Editor at Dark Reading. She started her career in business tech journalism at Insurance & Technology and most recently reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft and business IT. Sheridan earned her BA at Villanova University. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: just wondering...Thanx
Current Issue
Security Operations and IT Operations: Finding the Path to Collaboration
A wide gulf has emerged between SOC and NOC teams that's keeping both of them from assuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of IT systems. Here's how experts think it should be bridged.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.