Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/23/2018
04:38 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Battling Bots: How to Find Fake Twitter Followers

Duo researchers explain the approach they used to detect automated Twitter profiles and uncover a botnet.

The discovery of a massive botnet can start with finding a few fake Twitter followers, report Duo researchers investigating the process of identifying and analyzing automated accounts.

Earlier this summer, Duo's Olabode Anise, data scientist, and Jordan Wright, principal research and development engineer, wrapped up a project investigating how they could detect Twitter bot characteristics. The goal was to create a means of differentiating automated and legitimate accounts, and they built a classifier tool to distinguish bots based on a pre-defined set of traits.

Their research dug into one of the largest random datasets of public Twitter accounts to date, they report. As part of their project, Wright and Anise identified three specific types of bots serving different purposes. "Content-generating" bots actively create new content (spam, malicious link), "amplification" bots like and retweet content to boost a tweet's popularity, and "fake followers" are a type of amplification bot intended to inflate users' popularity.

The two today published a new report digging into the latter. Their analysis covers how fake followers operate, how they discovered an initial list of fake followers, and how they leveraged that list to unearth a botnet made up of at least 12,000 Twitter accounts.

"We understand the fake followers are just as important to the social ecosystem," says Anise. "They artificially inflate the ratio of followers to followees."

On one hand, fake followers can be used to harass, or compromise the credibility of, legitimate accounts. On the other, they can boost the popularity of fake accounts, making them appear more credible than they are. The researchers gave a talk at Black Hat USA discussing how a botnet spoofed legitimate accounts to evade detection and spread a cryptocurrency scam.

Spot the Bots

It's tough to tell when a follower is fake, and researchers explain more information is better when analyzing accounts. In general, fake followers are hard to detect on an individual level because they don't show much activity – aside from, of course, following other accounts.

But a lack of activity doesn't mean an account is malicious. Some people create Twitter accounts simply to follow other users and stay current on the news, Anise explains.

So instead of hunting fake followers on an individual basis, the researchers decided to consider their full social networks. Fake followers are typically purchased and used as groups; as a result, they tend to share characteristics because they are developed by the same operator.

But which traits set fake followers apart from real ones? After Anise and Wright wrapped their initial pool of research, the botnet they were watching began to use fake followers to trick people into thinking spoofed Twitter accounts were real. They took a closer look at the followers of a fake Elon Musk Twitter profile and explored their similarities.

"One thing that we saw was, [they were] pretty easy to identify," says Anise of the fake followers. "These bots weren't really trying to hide … if you notice patterns or have a similar account, you can use it to pivot and find other bot accounts."

Timing is one key factor. If a large group of accounts suddenly follows the same profile, for example, there's a higher likelihood they're fraudulent.

Accounts following the fake Elon Musk profile had a proverb or fortune in their profile description – a quick and easy means of bypassing spam detection. Profile completion is an easy way to determine the quality of a bot; if an account has a profile, it appears to be real. However, creating unique profiles is harder than generating random usernames.

With this in mind, the researchers could separate these bots from legitimate followers. Because they were studying the fake accounts as a group, they could observe whether similar accounts had similar behaviors. Once they found a small group of fake followers, they could branch outside that network and look for other fake accounts with similar traits.

How to Crawl for Followers

Anise and Wright uncovered the botnet with a "one-degree crawl" of a single fake follower. They found a fake account and looked at their social network, as well as the social network for each account the fake follower was following. They then applied a script to search the social network for a specific account. The result is a web of fake and legitimate profiles, connecting which fake accounts are following legitimate ones.

While it's a good start, not every bot in a botnet will follow the same people, meaning the researchers may not have caught entire groups of fake followers. To find new ones, Anise explains, they can use a bot found during their initial crawl and search its network for new fake followers. After doing this, they uncovered an additional 1,200 bots.

The two point out that large groups of fake followers have patterns that are easier to recognize; smaller groups, in contrast, may be more subtle. To find smaller groups of fake accounts, the researchers first determined when multiple accounts were created on the same day and consecutively followed a target account.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec 3-6 2018  with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
alan.martin.pmp@gmail.com
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Apprentice
3/17/2019 | 10:20:19 PM
Nice and informative post
Can I simply just say what a comfort to find somebody that really knows what they're discussing on the internet.

You definitely understand how to bring an issue to light and make it important.


More and more people really need to read this and understand this side of your story. It's surprising you're not more popular since you certainly possess the gift.
neiljakson105
0%
100%
neiljakson105,
User Rank: Guru
11/7/2018 | 11:06:24 AM
nice post
Great article. I totlly liked it. Your entire website is great. I am a finance brokers. We got folks awesome mortgages and other commercial finance. buy dissertation online
muneebkhatri
100%
0%
muneebkhatri,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/28/2018 | 5:47:50 AM
dissertation writing service
This was among the best posts and episode from your team it let me learn many new things.  
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/26/2018 | 10:33:21 PM
Fake unique profiles
> "However, creating unique profiles is harder than generating random usernames."

Sure, but maybe not that much harder.

Just throw a bunch of self-designations and cliches into a program, and have it randomly spit out a few.

Example: "Marketing enthusiast, dad of 3, professional cat herder, Giants fan. Tweets are my own."
SchemaCzar
0%
100%
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
10/24/2018 | 10:28:22 AM
I thought they just declare every conservative account is fake
ooops, I guess that will get me booted...
aronsalsa
50%
50%
aronsalsa,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/23/2018 | 5:19:48 PM
Fake twitter sccount
We all know that how social media is impacting everyone nowadays and twitter is one of the biggest platforms to make any statement to the world. There are many fake twitter accounts also and that has to be recognized and the given details here really making a point of out of that. 

Dell error code 2000-0142 is really supporting that.
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-18913
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
Opera before 57.0.3098.106 is vulnerable to a DLL Search Order hijacking attack where an attacker can send a ZIP archive composed of an HTML page along with a malicious DLL to the target. Once the document is opened, it may allow the attacker to take full control of the system from any location with...
CVE-2018-20031
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
A Denial of Service vulnerability related to preemptive item deletion in lmgrd and vendor daemon components of FlexNet Publisher version 11.16.1.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to send a combination of messages to lmgrd or the vendor daemon, causing the heartbeat between lmgrd and the vendor ...
CVE-2018-20032
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
A Denial of Service vulnerability related to message decoding in lmgrd and vendor daemon components of FlexNet Publisher version 11.16.1.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to send a combination of messages to lmgrd or the vendor daemon, causing the heartbeat between lmgrd and the vendor daemon t...
CVE-2018-20034
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
A Denial of Service vulnerability related to adding an item to a list in lmgrd and vendor daemon components of FlexNet Publisher version 11.16.1.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to send a combination of messages to lmgrd or the vendor daemon, causing the heartbeat between lmgrd and the vendor ...
CVE-2019-3855
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-21
An integer overflow flaw which could lead to an out of bounds write was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way packets are read from the server. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to execute code on the client system when a user connects to the server.