Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/23/2019
02:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Exploits for Adobe Vulnerabilities Spiked in 2018

With Flash Player on way out, attackers are renewing their focus on Acrobat Reader, RiskSense found.

Malware authors weaponized more Adobe software vulnerabilities in 2018 than any previous year while the actual number of newly disclosed security flaws in the company's products dropped significantly since reaching an all-time-high in 2016.

Security vendor RiskSense recently analyzed over 20 years of Adobe vulnerability data gathered from Adobe's own security bulletins and numerous third-party sources, including bug bounty programs and the national vulnerability database.

The analysis showed that of the 374 new Adobe vulnerabilities disclosed in 2018, exploits or malware became available for 177—or 47%—of them. Fifty of the vulnerabilities were weaponized even before a patch was available.

The numbers are significantly higher than previous years both in terms of the percentage of new vulnerabilities that were weaponized, and in terms of the number of Adobe flaws that were exploitable before patch availability. In 2017, for instance, just 21% of the vulnerabilities disclosed had associated exploits and malware. Similarly, the rate of exploits in the wild before patch availability was some three times higher last year than the previous high set in 2010, RiskSense said.

Ironically, the increased and accelerated weaponization of Adobe vulnerabilities happened during a year in which the overall number of new vulnerabilities disclosed was 31% lower than the record 538 vulnerabilities reported in 2016.

"2018 was definitely exceptional in terms of the weaponization of [Adobe] vulnerabilities," says Anand Paturi, manager of product research for RiskSense. What's not clear is whether the numbers are an anomaly or are indicative of a new trend, he says.

Paturi says that while malware authors were responsible for weaponizing some vulnerabilities, security researchers contributed to the situation as well by releasing proof-of-exploit code for Adobe flaws, sometimes before patch availability.  

"While this code is often very important for helping to understand the vulnerability and demonstrate its severity, this information can also sometimes accelerate the development of threats by attackers," Paturi says.

Acrobat Reader, Flash Player Most Vunlerable

RiskSense's study found that a total of 2,891 vulnerabilities were reported in Adobe products between 1996 and the end of 2018—a vast majority of them in Acrobat Reader and Flash Player. Reader accounted for 1,338 vulnerabilities, while Flash Player had 1,083.

Adobe's cloud-hosted Acrobat DC was another big contributor to the overall vulnerability count, with 300 since the product's 2015 launch. Nearly four-in-ten (38%) of the reported vulnerabilities in Adobe's products over the past 20 years were buffer overflows.

Exploits and malware are currently available for 721 of the vulnerabilities, of which 152 are either remotely exploitable, enable privilege escalation, or are associated with Web apps.

Security experts in recent years have considered Flash Player in particular as a major security threat because of the number of vulnerabilities—including numerous zero-days—that have been discovered in the product over the years. Attackers have frequently exploited Flash vulnerabilities to attack users across multiple platforms, and exploits for these flaws have been a staple in exploit kits such as Neutrino and Angler for years.

However, Adobe's decision to kill off Flash Player by 2020 has resulted in an overall decline in attacker interest in the technology - and a renewed focus on Acrobat Reader instead, Paturi says. Last year, there were just 24 reported Flash Player vulnerabilities.

This was a result of both Flash Player becoming less popular and of browser vendors adding security improvements to address Flash-related threats. "This has shifted attention to Adobe Acrobat Reader," Paturi note. "As the browser-based exploits of Flash have dried up, attackers are having to work a bit harder and are shifting attention back to attacking Reader," he says.

"Specifically, we are seeing a spike in remote code execution (RCE) exploits in Acrobat Reader and we expect to see that continue to rise."

Related Content:

 

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "SpearPhish! Everyone out of the office!"
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13584
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
The remote admin webserver on FANUC Robotics Virtual Robot Controller 8.23 allows Directory Traversal via a forged HTTP request.
CVE-2019-13585
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
The remote admin webserver on FANUC Robotics Virtual Robot Controller 8.23 has a Buffer Overflow via a forged HTTP request.
CVE-2019-13631
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
In parse_hid_report_descriptor in drivers/input/tablet/gtco.c in the Linux kernel through 5.2.1, a malicious USB device can send an HID report that triggers an out-of-bounds write during generation of debugging messages.
CVE-2019-13614
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
CMD_SET_CONFIG_COUNTRY in the TP-Link Device Debug protocol in TP-Link Archer C1200 1.0.0 Build 20180502 rel.45702 and earlier is prone to a stack-based buffer overflow, which allows a remote attacker to achieve code execution or denial of service by sending a crafted payload to the listening server...
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-17
tinymce 4.7.11, 4.7.12 is affected by: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation. The impact is: JavaScript code execution. The component is: Media element. The attack vector is: The victim must paste malicious content to media element's embed tab.