Vulnerabilities / Threats

2/6/2018
02:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Updates Payment, Criteria for Windows Bug Bounty

The Windows Insider Preview Bounty Program will award between $500 and $15,000 for eligible submissions.

Microsoft has updated the eligible submission criteria and payment tiers for its Windows Insider Preview bounty program, which first launched on July 26, 2017.

The program was created to find vulnerabilities that reproduce in versions of Windows released through the Windows Insider Preview (WIP) fast ring. Insiders test early releases of each OS update before the final release goes to the public, to eliminate bugs and security problems.

The typical payments for qualified submissions earn between $500 to $15,000 USD per bug. In an announcement on its latest update, Microsoft notes bounties are awarded at its discretion and higher payouts beyond $15,000 may be possible, depending on the quality and complexity of each entry.

Higher-quality reports lead to bigger payouts. The baseline reward for a remote code execution vulnerability ranges from $500 to $7,500, but a high-quality RCE report could earn up to $15,000 per bug. Similarly, the payout for a privilege escalation flaw ranges from $500 to $5,000 as a baseline sum, but up to $10,000 for a high-quality report.

Each submission must meet certain criteria to be eligible for payment. It must identify an original and unreported Critical or Important flaw in WIP Fast. The bug must reproduce in the version of WIP Fast being tested. Reports must have the vulnerability impact and attack vector.

A description of the problem, and the steps to reproduce it, must be easily understood to Microsoft engineers so they can patch. If a submission has all the info necessary for an engineer to reproduce, understand, and fix the problem - including a short write-up with background data, description, and proof-of-concept - it could earn more money.

Microsoft encourages any submissions describing security flaws in WIP Fast. It won't pay out for bugs in the Windows Store, Windows apps, firmware, third-party drivers, or third-party software in Windows. Vulnerabilities requiring "unlikely user actions" also don't count; neither do vulnerabilities that are known to Microsoft or require users to downgrade security settings.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Devastating Cyberattack on Email Provider Destroys 18 Years of Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/12/2019
Up to 100,000 Reported Affected in Landmark White Data Breach
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-8354
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c has an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8355
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. In xmalloc.h, there is an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into the lsx_valloc macro that wraps malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in channels_start in remix.c.
CVE-2019-8356
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. One of the arguments to bitrv2 in fft4g.c is not guarded, such that it can lead to write access outside of the statically declared array, aka a stack-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8357
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c allows a NULL pointer dereference.
CVE-2013-2516
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
Vulnerability in FileUtils v0.7, Ruby Gem Fileutils <= v0.7 Command Injection vulnerability in user supplied url variable that is passed to the shell.