Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV

12/20/2019
11:10 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Happier Holidays as Ad Threat Declines

DEVCON report finds that the number of ad-threat JavaScript attacks in the US diminished year-over-year, but what attacks there were increased in sophistication.

Security firm DEVCON has issued its 2019 Holiday Threat Reportwhich looks at the online scene occurring this year between Thanksgiving and Cyber Monday.

The report finds that the number of ad-threat JavaScript attacks in the US diminished year-over-year, but what attacks there were increased in sophistication. DEVCON uses the term "Ad Threat" to define a type of 3rd Party JavaScript exploitation that was in the advertising space and to separate it from the more general industry problem -- ad fraud.

Every third-party service that offers animated graphics, photo slideshows, chat bots, or shopping carts creates new vulnerabilities for the organizations that use them with the embedding of JavaScript.

DEVCON found that, “a dramatic decline in the volume of many simplistic ad hacks over the last year. Less advanced hackers are being shut out of the ad threat game, but the more advanced bad actors are not only becoming more stealthy in obfuscating these attacks, they have escalated the types of exploits, broadened the attack surface and they are not limiting these attacks to the ad tag scripts.”

So, what does “3rd Party JavaScript” do for an attacker? One route it enables is that bad actors are creating fake accounts with ad networks and using that company's ad tags to deliver exploits onto sites without ever needing to compromise the target company's servers.

Partner exploitation can happen when the attacker looks for third-party partners on checkout or payment pages and finds one that is easily compromised. That code is then used to gain access and collect user data as users are entering it.

Of course, an attacker can use any inherent vulnerabilities in the JavaScript itself (or the libraries that it uses) to carry out their attack.

Also, in the case of infected assets like image files, fonts or ads, JavaScript that is being delivered back and forth can be used to hide exploits. An image for an ad that has been infected with malicious script would be an example of this.

The report says that 2019 has seen malvertisers switch from almost entirely targeting mobile devices to the majority targeting desktop browsers. The desktop exploits are usually far more devastating to the victim when successful than the mobile redirects since they deliver a much more capable and malicious payload like a trojan.

Over 60% of the activity DEVCON observed over the shopping holiday came from variants of the Led Zelpdesk, Lucky Star, Avid Diva and Invisible Ink attacks. These attacks use a combination of social engineering and exploited JavaScript to steal a user's credit card information, have them download a trojan, or both.

It has been a continuing trend that malvertising activity has been down year over year. The report found .07% of ads over this time period contained malicious code in 2019, as opposed to 1.25% in 2018. There is no clear indicator of why this holiday shopping season saw so relatively few bad ads, but there are several factors that could contribute.

The report thinks that the security of the ad ecosystem may be influenced by market-based factors. If ad networks raise the standards for admitting buyers into their system, malvertisers will find it more difficult to sneak in.

It may be that the increased attention to the problem and adoption of security tools could also be dissuading cybercriminals who have previously experienced easier environments for cybercrime in this time period.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25789
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in Tiny Tiny RSS (aka tt-rss) before 2020-09-16. The cached_url feature mishandles JavaScript inside an SVG document.
CVE-2020-25790
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
** DISPUTED ** Typesetter CMS 5.x through 5.1 allows admins to upload and execute arbitrary PHP code via a .php file inside a ZIP archive. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report because "admins are considered trustworthy"; however, the behavior "contradicts our secu...
CVE-2020-25791
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in the sized-chunks crate through 0.6.2 for Rust. In the Chunk implementation, the array size is not checked when constructed with unit().
CVE-2020-25792
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in the sized-chunks crate through 0.6.2 for Rust. In the Chunk implementation, the array size is not checked when constructed with pair().
CVE-2020-25793
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in the sized-chunks crate through 0.6.2 for Rust. In the Chunk implementation, the array size is not checked when constructed with From<InlineArray<A, T>>.