Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV //

Malware

10/22/2019
11:05 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Two Threat Actors, One Targeted Threat

By combining, two threat actors leveraged their own specific areas of expertise into one highly efficient and private tool.

When the GrandCrab ransomware operators quit the arena, they left an vacuum that others have tried to fill.

Since April 2019, Sodinokibi (a.k.a. REvil) has been a major player. The operation has gained the respect of fellow cybercriminals as well as security researchers.

The ransomware, for example, has been deployed on Oracle WebLogic servers through the use of a critical deserialization vulnerability. \r\nThere is an interesting similarity between the GrandCrab ransomware and REvil's malware in one area. Both will not do business in Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan or Uzbekistan.

REvil had the malware, but not the reach to deliver it as widely as they would have wished.

AdvIntel, a NYC-based security firm with some seemingly deep contacts in Russia, says it noticed a threat actor with a moniker of -TMT- joining a top-level Russian hack forum in May of this year.

He then started talking about his "warez." AdvIntel further observed that during, "June, July, and August, they were looking for customers to monetize corporate network compromises, however, not specifying the victim names, instead referring to the breaches as 'fat accesses'. At the same time, in private communication, -TMT- offered several accesses to compromised entities, as well as stolen credentials for administrative accounts on the victim's websites. Their breach prices ranged from $3,000 to $5,000 USD."

They said they had the access. They said they had a way to do this that seemed reasonable. Their Tactics, Techniques & Procedures (TTPs) were focused on doing breaches of corporate networks. For these purposes, they were using compromised remote desktop protocols and credential-stealing malware as the initial attack vectors.

The actor even said, according to AdvIntel, that Cobalt Strike Beacon was used to access secure environments. Beacon is Cobalt Strike's payload used for as initial payload. Beacon's shell command allows executing command prompt commands on the compromised host.

REvil noticed. Since August 2019, AdvIntel says, -TMT- had been partnering with REvil developers to support the -TMT- crypto locker uploads. Both parties joined in an effort to customize ransomware admin panels so that they didn't need to be rented from a third-party as a service. It was also expressed by the hacker forum participants that an approach with less third-party participation added to the security of a overall ransomware operation.

They also think that the joining of -TMT- and REvil was the main reason why the two actors almost simultaneously left the Exploit forum, no doubt to communicate by other means with each other. AdvIntel also said in the blog that, "The data breach community has been constantly sharing their concerns regarding the inefficiency of direct breach monetization via underground forums. Indeed, many high-profile breaches were compromised by unexperienced buyers or law enforcement during the initial examination of the admin panel access."

So, it seems that publicly hanging out your accesses for sale in an access-as-a-service scheme wasn't a great business model. But by combining, the two threat actors leveraged their own specific areas of expertise into one highly efficient -- and private -- tool.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cloud Security Threats for 2021
Or Azarzar, CTO & Co-Founder of Lightspin,  12/3/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27772
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in coders/bmp.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned int`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could po...
CVE-2020-27773
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/gem-private.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned char` or division by zero. This would most likely lead to an impact to appli...
CVE-2020-28950
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
The installer of Kaspersky Anti-Ransomware Tool (KART) prior to KART 4.0 Patch C was vulnerable to a DLL hijacking attack that allowed an attacker to elevate privileges during installation process.
CVE-2020-27774
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/statistic.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of a too large shift for 64-bit type `ssize_t`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but co...
CVE-2020-27775
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/quantum.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type unsigned char. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but c...