Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV

10/11/2019
09:50 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

New 'Reductor' Malware Intercepts Browser Traffic

Encrypted traffic from both Chrome and Firefox shown to be vulnerable.

Kaspersky has identifiedmalware that takes a novel approach to intercepting both Chrome and Firefox browsers' encrypted traffic. They have identified targets of the malware to be in Russia and Belarus.

First identified in April of this year, the new modules are named "Reductor" after a .pdb path Kaspersky found in some samples. Besides the typical RAT functions such as uploading, downloading and executing files, Reductor's authors impressed the Kaspersky researchers by putting a lot of effort into the manipulation of digital certificates and marking outbound TLS traffic with unique host-related identifiers.

Kaspersky tentatively linked it to the Turla APT, based on the victimology. Victimology alone is an unreliable attributor in most cases, however. Turla is the name of a Russian cyber espionage APT group (which has also been known as Waterbug, Venomous Bear and KRYPTON) that has been active since at least 2007 targeting government organizations and private businesses. The list of victims is long and is said to include the Swiss defense firm RUAG, US Department of State, and the US Central Command.

There are strong code similarities between this family and the COMPfun Trojan. In fact, Kaspersky says that, "Based on these similarities, we're quite sure the new malware was developed by the COMPfun authors."

The researchers say that Reductor spreads by either (1) infecting popular software distributions (Internet Downloader Manager, WinRAR, etc. and, for at least one case identified by the reasearchers, through a popular "warez" website over HTTP); or (2) its decryptor/dropper is spread through the use of COMpfun's ability to download files on hosts that have already been infected.

Marking the browser's TLS handshake without touching the traffic itself got the researchers' attention. It seems the malware developers analyzed the Firefox source code and Chrome binary code to patch the corresponding pseudo random number generation (PRNG) functions in the process's memory.

The researchers explain the method used by the malware in this way: "Browsers use PRNG to generate the 'client random' sequence for the network packet at the very beginning of the TLS handshake. Reductor adds encrypted unique hardware- and software-based identifiers for the victims to this 'client random' field. In order to patch the system's PRNG functions, the developers used a small embedded Intel instruction length disassembler."

Reductor adds its own "victim id" inside TLS packets. The first four-byte hash (cert_hash) is built using all of Reductor's digital certificates.

Kaspersky found that Reductor samples hold DER-encoded root X509v3 certificates in the .data section to add on the target hosts. The malware is also able to get additional certificates from the operators through a named pipe.

Rather interestingly, Reductor does not run a MitM attack itself. Yet the certificates that it installs would be a vital part of any such attack if such an attack were carried out.

Another idiosyncrasy of Reductor is that the malware's installation seems to be done "on the fly." The source installers that were seen by the researchers were not compromised themselves, but compromised browsers were delivered by them.

The entire methodology of the attack shows sophistication in execution, a sure indicator of a nation-state threat actor.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5421
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.
CVE-2020-8225
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
A cleartext storage of sensitive information in Nextcloud Desktop Client 2.6.4 gave away information about used proxies and their authentication credentials.
CVE-2020-8237
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Prototype pollution in json-bigint npm package < 1.0.0 may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
CVE-2020-8245
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Improper Input Validation on Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11....
CVE-2020-8246
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11.2 before 11.2.1a, Citrix SD-W...