Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV //

Phishing

11/1/2018
08:15 AM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now
50%
50%

New 'Sextortion' Schemes Fueled by Stolen Passwords & Credentials

Cybercriminals are using a cache of old, stolen credentials and passwords to fuel a new spate of 'sextortion' campaigns aimed at embarrassing individual users, according to data compiled by Barracuda Networks.

Cybercriminals are using a stash of old, stolen credentials and passwords to fuel a new wave of so-called "sextortion" campaigns that are targeting individuals with embarrassing information and asking for payment in Bitcoin to keep quiet.

Barracuda Networks took notice of this uptick in sextortion schemes starting in July. Researchers looked at 1,000 examples of this threat over a few days and found about 24,000 emails since the beginning of September that used the same set of sender addresses.

In its October 31 report, Barracuda noted that many of these emails came from customers who voluntarily reported these extortion emails, meaning that its likely these attacks are much larger than the samples researchers looked at.

However, Barracuda researchers found that the cybercriminals behind these schemes do not actually possess any compromising or embarrassing materials about the people they are targeting. Indeed, the bad actors don't even seem to have the malware that they claim are part of the threat.

Instead, cybercrooks are using old, stolen passwords that are part of the AntiPublic Combo List, a cache of some 500 million stolen credentials from various data breaches that has been available since at least 2016. The scam starts with the threat actors contacting an individual, showing them old passwords and claiming that a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) has been installed on their machine.

The cybercriminals claim, with little evidence, that they possess videos and other data that show the victim frequenting various pornographic websites. The bad actors threaten to release that information to the person's contact lists unless payment is made in cryptocurrency, typically Bitcoin.

Since the cybercrooks behind the scheme don't have the RATs and other sophisticated malware that they claim to have, Barracuda researchers determined that these sextortion schemes are no more that sophisticated forms of phishing attacks, trying to trick the victim into panicking and sending money.

Poor grammar and spelling used in the emails are also telltale signs that the scam is not a sophisticated cyberattack.

"I wouldn't really refer to this as a 'coordinated attack.' It seems like a group that's usually engaged in spam/phishing found a new approach, but it's not particularly sophisticated despite being creative," Jonathan Tanner, a senior security researcher at Barracuda, wrote in an email to Security Now. "As for 'why now,' someone probably just came up with the idea one day, since the data being used is two-years-old (thus it's not a reaction to some new data being released)."

How successful these sextortion schemes are remains to be seen.

Of the 1,000 Bitcoin wallets associated with the cybercriminals that Barracuda looked at, researchers only found four transfers made. However, since the bad actors can collect between $1,000 and $7,000 with each attack and little upfront investment, it's easy to see why this a lucrative scheme.

In addition to English, researchers observed these emails being written in German and Spanish. The scheme has been detected in several countries, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Spain, Guatemala, Hungary, Ireland, Iceland, Japan, Sri Lanka, Netherlands, the UK and the US.

In many cases, the Barracuda team noticed that these extortion messages were sent to business email addresses, but Tanner noted that the goal is to scare and isolate one individual instead of targeting a whole company.

"Other than the volume of spam being received by enterprises with the campaign, this is certainly a user problem," Tanner added. "Given it's (fake) blackmail, the intention is to isolate the user from reaching out and scare them into paying the fee for not 'being embarrassed.' There is nothing to specifically target the enterprise even when sent through their mail system."

In addition to being on the outlook for these types of phishing emails, Barracuda is recommending that anyone who is still using old passwords and credentials to update those to new ones.

"I suspect this attack will be ongoing until the financial returns diminish and/or the group either comes up with a new scam or pivots back to an old one," Tanner wrote. "Regardless, there are still people who fall for traditional 419 scams so it's likely this sort of scam is here to stay, at least to some extent (perhaps changing the blackmail premise or utilizing a new set of breach data that has yet to be obtained or released)."

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson is the managing editor of Light Reading and the editor of Security Now. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...