Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

8/20/2019
12:50 PM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Fintech Startups Get Sloppy With Application Security

Some startups need to shape up or ship out.

British security firm Immuniweb has looked at CB Insights' report entitled "The Fintech 250: The Top Fintech Startups Of 2018" to identify 250 financial tech companies that are still in their early development stages. The report aimed to shed some light on the overall state of web and application security of the fintech companies and compare it with the results of traditional banks.

Immuniweb did similar research on banks which they reported out as "State of Application Security at S&P Global World's 100 Largest Banks," so they do have some experience in analyzing the financial sector.

This time, they come to some sweeping conclusions. For instance, they found 100% of the companies that they looked at have security, privacy and compliance issues related to abandoned or forgotten web applications, APIs and subdomains.

The severity of those issues may vary greatly, with few websites actually failing the tests. A fail would have meant "Exploitable and publicly known security vulnerabilities found."

As far as website security, two main startup websites had the highest "A+" grades both for (1) SSL encryption and (2) website security fully meeting applicable PCI DSS and GDRP compliance requirements. On other websites, Immmuniweb found 64 security issues related to outdated web software or its components. One website had as many as 17 outdated JS libraries and other external software components.

Subdomains were in worse shape for security. There were 2,474 outdated software components across the tested subdomains. The oldest vulnerable CMS is WordPress 4.7.1, with 26 publicly known security issues so far.

SSL/TLS was well implemented by the sites across the board. Only one main website scored with a "B" grade, while all others received "A" or even the highest possible "A+" grades.

But the situation with HTTPS encryption on the subdomains is "alarming," according to Immuniweb. As many as 93 subdomains had the failing "F" grade, and 537 had an untrusted or expired SSL certificate.

GDPR tests were abysmal. As the report says, "64 main websites failed the GDPR compliance test. After vulnerable web software, the second most frequent reason is a missing cookie disclaimer or unset security flags on cookies that transfer tracking, PII or otherwise sensitive information. The third top cause is missing or inaccessible privacy policy." Looks like a lot of work is needed there, and the subdomains as well.

The report looks at fintech's mobile applications too. They found 100% of the mobile applications contained at least one medium-risk security vulnerability, 97% of the mobile applications had two or more medium-risk vulnerabilities, and 3% of the mobile applications contained at least one high-risk security vulnerability. Yikes. While the report offers more detail, the theme stays the same. These startups have to concentrate on their business or they, in time, will lose their customers.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20934
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.2.6. On NUMA systems, the Linux fair scheduler has a use-after-free in show_numa_stats() because NUMA fault statistics are inappropriately freed, aka CID-16d51a590a8c.
CVE-2020-29368
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in __split_huge_pmd in mm/huge_memory.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.5. The copy-on-write implementation can grant unintended write access because of a race condition in a THP mapcount check, aka CID-c444eb564fb1.
CVE-2020-29369
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in mm/mmap.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.11. There is a race condition between certain expand functions (expand_downwards and expand_upwards) and page-table free operations from an munmap call, aka CID-246c320a8cfe.
CVE-2020-29370
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk in mm/slub.c in the Linux kernel before 5.5.11. The slowpath lacks the required TID increment, aka CID-fd4d9c7d0c71.
CVE-2020-29371
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in romfs_dev_read in fs/romfs/storage.c in the Linux kernel before 5.8.4. Uninitialized memory leaks to userspace, aka CID-bcf85fcedfdd.