Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

11/14/2018
09:35 AM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now
50%
50%

Sophos: 'Living off the Land' Is the Law of the Land

In its annual Threat Report, Sophos Labs researchers find that cybercriminals are using 'living off the Land' techniques more frequently for their attacks. At the same time, the study finds that ransomware is getting more hands-on.

For cybercriminals, "living off the land," has become the new law of the land when it comes to planning and executing attacks against enterprises.

Living off the land (LotL) is now an increasingly popular technique for cybercriminals since it uses tools -- typically those found in newer versions of Windows -- that are already installed on the targeted computers or systems. LotL can also including running simple scripts or shellcode that is embedded in memory. (See WannaCry: How the Notorious Worm Changed Ransomware.)

Since more and more businesses are moving to Windows 10, cybercriminals are taking advantage of a whole host of administrative tools, including PowerShell, Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) and the Windows Scripting Host that come bundled with the operating systems. Now, a malware attack is likely to start with a PowerShell .ps1 or a Windows Scripting Host .js file as it would with a executable.

The growing use of LotL techniques is one of the key findings of Sophos Labs' 2019 Threat Report, which the company released November 14.

"In the enterprise, you can see that most of the businesses have moved to Windows 10, and that means that Windows Scripting Host is going to be present, PowerShell is going to be present, and those are the two most abused tools," said Chester Wisniewski, the principal research scientist at Sophos, in an interview with Security Now.

"From a defense standpoint, these tools are all or nothing," Wisniewski added. "You can have application security policies to lock down certain apps, and say they are allowed to run or not allowed to run. The problem with that is that the administrators can't run them, and that's a bit of a problem since they are already using these tools to run your environment. So that's what the criminals are counting on."

By using administrative tools, cybercriminals can break up the attack into smaller parts to help evade antivirus tools. In this case, each command and administrative system triggers another part of the attack. The example Sophos uses is a victim double-clicking a malicious .js file, which then triggers an wscript.exe, which then starts a download and this launches a PowerShell.ps1 script and this finally downloads and launches the executable.

"When you are sitting in the lab and you see the whole thing laid out in a chain, you say to yourself, 'Oh that's so suspicious,' " Wisniewski said. "The problem is most antivirus or antimalware software sees all that individually and not as a chain."

When this chain of events is broken down into individual steps, the malware can hide from antivirus and other protective software. This also helps hide the anomalies in the malware from the everyday traffic that flows through the network. As the report explains:

The problem is not limited to a small number of executable file types that have to be observed, tracked, and have their behavior monitored. With a wide range of file types that include several "plain text" scripts, chained in no particular order and without any predictability, the challenge becomes how to separate the normal operations of a computer from the anomalous behavior of a machine in the throes of a malware infection.

Lessons from SamSam
In addition to LotL techniques, Sophos researchers found how attackers are delivering ransomware is changing, with cybercriminals taking a more hands-on approach and using less commodity malware. Instead, they are tapping into these administrative tools to hide their efforts for as long as possible.

This pattern of ransomware was first developed by the group behind SamSam that has collected about $6 million in ransom over the last several years. (See SamSam Ransomware Nears $6M Mark in Ill-Gotten Gains .)

In Wisniewski's view, the SamSam group works in much the same way as a typical penetration testing team would when checking an enterprise for vulnerabilities. The attack starts with looking for systems with weak passwords, typically outward facing Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) servers and using brute-force attack methods to steal the credentials.

Once inside the perimeter, the SamSam group maps the networks over a 24- to 72-hour period, looking for valuable data -- databases, for example -- and disabling or erasing backup files, so that when the files are locked, the company can't recover and the ransom is paid, mostly in cryptocurrency.

SamSam has faded over the last few months -- Sophos only found one incident report in all of October -- but these types of more labor intensive and hands-on techniques have given rise to other ransomware attacks, including BitPaymer and Dharma.

The advantage for the security team is that a human-centric attack does give some time to stop or limit the attack, if the anomalies are found within the windows of time that attackers are using to set up the attack.

"Unlike a bot-style attack, where you open up an attachment and -- boom -- your computer is locked with ransomware, since it's human operated and it takes them 24- to 72-hours to do their survey to find the valuable assets in your network... if you can react quickly, you can often maintain or eliminate the damage before it occurs," Wisniewski said. "If you get that alert, you have time. If you notice the anomaly and you detect it, you're not screwed yet and that's new because most of the attacks have been automated."

The downside is that handy administration tools, such as PowerShell, can no longer be trusted in the same way. "Most of us are not going to give up our tools and as a security community, I don't think we have come up with a good answer to that problem yet," Wisniewski added.

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson is the managing editor of Light Reading and the editor of Security Now. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-14180
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Service Desk Server and Data Center allow remote attackers authenticated as a non-administrator user to view Project Request-Types and Descriptions, via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the editform request-type-fields resource. The affected versions are...
CVE-2020-14177
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to impact the application's availability via a Regex-based Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in JQL version searching. The affected versions are before version 7.13.16; from version 7.14.0 before 8.5.7; from versio...
CVE-2020-14179
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote, unauthenticated attackers to view custom field names and custom SLA names via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the /secure/QueryComponent!Default.jspa endpoint. The affected versions are before version 8.5.8, and from...
CVE-2020-25789
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in Tiny Tiny RSS (aka tt-rss) before 2020-09-16. The cached_url feature mishandles JavaScript inside an SVG document.
CVE-2020-25790
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
** DISPUTED ** Typesetter CMS 5.x through 5.1 allows admins to upload and execute arbitrary PHP code via a .php file inside a ZIP archive. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report because "admins are considered trustworthy"; however, the behavior "contradicts our secu...