Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/13/2016
01:00 PM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail

7 Ways Electronic Voting Systems Can Be Attacked

Pre-election integrity tests and post-election audits and checks should help spot discrepancies and errors, but risks remain.
2 of 8

Attacks on Election Management and Voter Registration Systems

Voting machines - the equipment that people actually use to cast their ballots - are not connected to the internet and therefore are not remotely accessible in most situations. But the same is not true of the systems that people use to register for voting online.

Security vulnerabilities in such systems can be remotely accessed and exploited over the internet.

Attackers have already targeted online voter registration systems in some 20 states. Two of the states - Illinois and Arizona - have confirmed breaches of their systems. In August, the Illinois State Board of Elections said unknown attackers had potentially accessed 86,000 voter records. In June, Arizona's Secretary of State shut down portions of its voter registration site for a few days after a county official's computer was breached and a credential related to the registration system was compromised.

But the chances of such intrusions somehow effecting election outcomes are remote. 'Poll books, printed records, back-ups and back-ups of back-ups all provide multiple layers of security around this part of the process,' said the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS).  It is highly difficult to leverage such systems for changing outcomes.

Image Source: Pew Charitable Trusts

Attacks on Election Management and Voter Registration Systems

Voting machines the equipment that people actually use to cast their ballots are not connected to the internet and therefore are not remotely accessible in most situations. But the same is not true of the systems that people use to register for voting online.

Security vulnerabilities in such systems can be remotely accessed and exploited over the internet.

Attackers have already targeted online voter registration systems in some 20 states. Two of the states Illinois and Arizona have confirmed breaches of their systems. In August, the Illinois State Board of Elections said unknown attackers had potentially accessed 86,000 voter records. In June, Arizonas Secretary of State shut down portions of its voter registration site for a few days after a county officials computer was breached and a credential related to the registration system was compromised.

But the chances of such intrusions somehow effecting election outcomes are remote. Poll books, printed records, back-ups and back-ups of back-ups all provide multiple layers of security around this part of the process, said the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS). It is highly difficult to leverage such systems for changing outcomes.

Image Source: Pew Charitable Trusts

2 of 8
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/15/2016 | 1:43:46 PM
One place where we need open source
Contributing to all of these factors (especially #3) is that electronic voting systems are proprietary and not open source.  Accordingly, there is no real auditing that can be done -- and whenever an update gets pushed out, it has to go through an onerous, lengthy vetting process (where very little genuinely useful information actually gets discovered) -- sometimes up to two years...meaning that systems stay un-updated for two years or more, that the updates may be ineffective if not outright bad, and that local governments don't have the time or money to train their volunteers on the systems.
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13643
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Stored XSS in EspoCRM before 5.6.4 allows remote attackers to execute malicious JavaScript and inject arbitrary source code into the target pages. The attack begins by storing a new stream message containing an XSS payload. The stored payload can then be triggered by clicking a malicious link on the...
CVE-2019-13644
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.1 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in a budget name. The JavaScript code is contained in a transaction, and is executed on the tags/show/$tag_number$ tag summary page.
CVE-2019-13645
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in image file names. The JavaScript code is executed during attachments/edit/$file_id$ attachment editing.
CVE-2019-13646
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to reflected XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in a search query.
CVE-2019-13647
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in image file content. The JavaScript code is executed during attachments/view/$file_id$ attachment viewing.