Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

1/3/2019
06:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Emotet Malware Gets More Aggressive

Emotet's operators have been adding new capabilities, making the malware now even more dangerous to its enterprise targets.

Emotet, a nasty botnet and popular malware family, has proven increasingly dangerous over the past year as its operators adopt new tactics. Now armed with the ability to drop additional payloads and arriving via business email compromise (BEC), it's become a major threat to organizations.

Security watchers are wary of Emotet, which was among the first botnets to spread banking Trojans laterally within target organizations, making removal difficult. Emotet first appeared in 2014 as a Trojan designed to snatch banking credentials and other sensitive data. The threat was frequently spread via phishing emails packed with malicious documents or links.

Over time, Emotet's operators - a group called Mealybug - have evolved its business model and the shape of their attack from a banking Trojan to a means of delivering other groups' threats. In 2018, Webroot dubbed Emotet the year's worst botnet seen distributing banking Trojans.

"Its information stealing payloads are delivered at an impressive pace, suggesting threat actors have automated multiple steps in their campaign operations," Webroot researchers write in a blog post on their rankings of 2018's worst threats. The changes to Emotet, while gradual at first, quickly ramped up in recent years as attackers switched to even more nefarious tactics.

After a quiet period in 2015, Emotet detections spiked in the second half of 2017, Symantec reported. Mealybug's victims expanded that year to include targets in Canada, China, Mexico, and the UK. Toward the end of 2017, the Cylance Threat Research Team analyzed a malicious Microsoft Word file with a malicious macro program created to download Emotet malware.

Taking on New Threats

In 2018, Mealybug ramped up its activity to the point where it was selling malware to other actors, says Sig Murphy, managing director of incident response and forensics at Cylance. Emotet was combined with Trickbot and Qakbot, a tactic Symantec also had detected in Feb. 2018. The blend of Emotet with other strains of ransomware made the threat more dangerous.

"The combination there is really hard to defend against properly because the loader is polymorphic," says Murphy. "It changes every time it infects a computer."

US-CERT issued an alert for Emotet in July 2018, calling it an advanced modular banking Trojan that mainly functions as a downloader or dropper of other banking Trojans. Emotet is "the most costly and destructive malware affecting state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) governments, and the private and public sectors," it says, costing governments up to $1M per incident.

This hybrid threat model "is a unique challenge" to organizations, Murphy says, and catches many off guard. Emotet alone used to drop its own Emotet-branded malware. Later in the year, it was used to deliver new types of threats. Before, it would collect email credentials and use them to spread laterally. It later became interested in the content of targeted emails, he adds.

"It's pretty clear they're trying to pivot into [the] BEC attack model, which is different from what they've done in the past," says Murphy of the Mealybug threat group's evolving strategies. In August 2018, Trend Micro pick up on Spoofed banking emails arriving with Emotet malware. For example, spam emails contain payment notifications from spoofed bank email addresses. The email's body has a link to download a .doc file, which contains macros that, when run, activate a PowerShell command that downloads and runs the Emotet malware, researchers explain. 

After ramping up in early 2018, Murphy says Emotet increased again during the holiday season. Through the start of 2019, the malware continued to spread, and new enterprise clients were asking Cylance for help after getting infected, he says. Its growth signifies greater maturity among the Mealybug actors as they learn what's effective.

"They seem much more organized than a lot of other groups," Murphy explains. "The shift [to BEC] says they're continuing to be more organized … they know what's working and what's not." New ransomware variants like Qakbot provide a new source of income, he adds.

Thinking Ahead of the Attackers

It's hard to tell what Mealybug will do next. One route they could take, says Murphy, is attempt to make their attacks quieter. While he has no indication they might do this, he points out how Emotet in its current form is "very noisy" in its spread. If they could change the threat so it spreads without taking down systems, it would be harder to know a business is at risk.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
0%
100%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
1/9/2019 | 7:10:42 AM
For a bit of humor
Which we all need from time to time.  Doesn't Emotet sounds like somebody buried in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt?
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/1/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Well I dont run on MacOS, so I need to take extra precautions"
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13759
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
rust-vmm vm-memory before 0.1.1 and 0.2.x before 0.2.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (loss of IP networking) because read_obj and write_obj do not properly access memory. This affects aarch64 (with musl or glibc) and x86_64 (with musl).
CVE-2020-7662
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
websocket-extensions npm module prior to 1.0.4 allows Denial of Service (DoS) via Regex Backtracking. The extension parser may take quadratic time when parsing a header containing an unclosed string parameter value whose content is a repeating two-byte sequence of a backslash and some other characte...
CVE-2020-7663
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
websocket-extensions ruby module prior to 0.1.5 allows Denial of Service (DoS) via Regex Backtracking. The extension parser may take quadratic time when parsing a header containing an unclosed string parameter value whose content is a repeating two-byte sequence of a backslash and some other charact...
CVE-2020-12017
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
GE Grid Solutions Reason RT Clocks, RT430, RT431, and RT434, all firmware versions prior to 08A05. The device’s vulnerability in the web application could allow multiple unauthenticated attacks that could cause serious impact. The vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated attacke...
CVE-2018-18623
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
Grafana 5.3.1 has XSS via the "Dashboard > Text Panel" screen. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-12099.