Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/7/2019
03:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Enterprises Must Be Wary of Ransomware Targeting Network File Shares & Cloud Assets

New research shows that criminals are evolving ransomware attacks against servers, network hosts, and IaaS cloud assets in search of bigger payoffs from businesses.

Ransomware attacks against individual endpoints are so passé. According to reports out this week from two security research teams, financially motivated cybercriminals are updating their ransomware playbooks in search of bigger payoffs from their victims. Increasingly, they're making more money by putting bigger game in the crosshairs, namely networked business assets such as file shares, servers, network hosts, and infrastructure-as-a-service cloud infrastructure.

A new study from researchers at Vectra shows that the biggest threat to enterprises from ransomware today is malicious encryption of shared network files. Whereas ransomware attacks against isolated endpoints should be no big deal to recover from with any modicum of backup procedures, ransomware targeting of file shares is much more likely to trigger "all-hands-on-deck" emergencies. First of all, attackers are able to do a lot more damage with minimal action by taking advantage of the scale of share volume availability to numerous local systems. It takes only a single access point to lock access to documents across numerous departments or divisions at a targeted organization.

"In a volume-sharing system, a single infected host could encrypt an entire networked volume, resulting in a global impact on the target organization's business and systems," the report explains.

What's more, in many instances, these shared volumes are themselves used as a part of backup procedures for other systems so recovery can become quite tricky without offline backups.

"The files must be recovered from the most recent cold backup if the ransom is not paid," the report says. "Backup systems attached to a network are also at risk, which is why cold offline backups are critical for recovery."

The potential risk — and payout for extortionary criminals — increases tremendously when ransomware attackers can successfully target cloud provider infrastructure and storage shares. The Vectra report points to several high-profile attacks against cloud hosting firms DataResolution.net and iNSYNQ as examples of the dynamic at play.

"The fallout from ransomware attacks against cloud service providers is far more devastating when the business systems of every cloud-hosted customer are encrypted," says Chris Morales, head of security analytics at Vectra. "Today's targeted ransomware attacks are an efficient, premeditated criminal threat with a rapid close and no middleman."

According to Vectra's study, the volume of these attacks is on the decline, but that could simply be a factor of criminals getting more discriminating and more effective with ransomware targeting. There are plenty of new and effective ransomware techniques and malware families deluging enterprises with these network-centric attacks. For example, in the past month, there have been two waves of attacks specifically targeted against enterprise storage devices from QNAP Network and Iomega.

And just this Monday, the industry saw more evidence of the evolution of the ransomware strain MegaCortex, which targets important files on servers and network hosts and is tied to attacks that have asked for as much as $5.8 million from large organizations. New analysis out from researchers with Accenture iDefense shows a version 2 of MegaCortex floating around that shifts this from a very manual ransomware tool to something with automated self-execution features.

"The authors of MegaCortex v2 have redesigned the ransomware to self-execute and removed the password requirement for installation. The changes suggest that the malware authors traded some security for ease of use and automation," writes Leo Fernandes, senior manager for malware analysis and countermeasures at Accenture iDefense. "Potentially, there could be an increase in the number of MegaCortex incidents if actors decide to start delivering it through email campaigns or dropped as a secondary stage by other malware families.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
8/7/2019 | 10:52:37 PM
Ways to combat the problem
There are numerous ways to address the problems with fileshares:
  • Enable LanMan Workstation parameters to 1
  • File and Print Sharing should be set to Authentication and Encryption

 

Encrypt File & Printer

When it comes to SMB/CIFS sharing. User can add this to their GPO policies to help address this file/printer sharing issue across the board.



A word to the wise, at least we hope.


Todd
44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9405
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
IBL Online Weather before 4.3.5a allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via the redirect page.
CVE-2020-9406
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
IBL Online Weather before 4.3.5a allows unauthenticated eval injection via the queryBCP method of the Auxiliary Service.
CVE-2020-9407
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
IBL Online Weather before 4.3.5a allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading the IWEBSERVICE_JSONRPC_COOKIE cookie.
CVE-2020-9398
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-25
ISPConfig before 3.1.15p3, when the undocumented reverse_proxy_panel_allowed=sites option is manually enabled, allows SQL Injection.
CVE-2015-5201
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-25
VDSM and libvirt in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor (aka RHEV-H) 7-7.x before 7-7.2-20151119.0 and 6-6.x before 6-6.7-20151117.0 as packaged in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization before 3.5.6 when VSDM is run with -spice disable-ticketing and a VM is suspended and then restored, allows r...