Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/19/2020
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Microsoft Tops Q3 List of Most-Impersonated Brands

The technology sector was also the most likely targeted industry for brand phishing attacks, according to Check Point's latest report on brand phishing.

Microsoft bumped Amazon and Google to place first for the brand most imitated by cybercriminals in phishing attacks that go after individuals' account credentials and payment information, according to Check Point's "Q3 Brand Phishing Report."

According to Omer Dembinsky, team leader on Check Point's data research team, 19% of all brand phishing attempts studied by the company last quarter related to Microsoft. Overall, 44% of phishing attacks were via email, 43% were via the Web, and another 12% were mobile.

Related Content:

Phishing Attack Targets Microsoft 365 Users With Netflix & Amazon Lures

2020 State of Cybersecurity Operations and Incident Response

New on The Edge: Expert Tips to Keep WordPress Safe

"We don't know for sure what the reasons are, but it's clear that many organizations have their people working remotely using Office 365 and Teams, and those Microsoft applications are vulnerable," Dembinsky says. "We don't always tell people whythe trends exist – our goal is to tell security teams whatthe risks are so they can respond."

Stu Sjouwerman, CEO of KnowBe4, which provides security awareness training, says Microsoft is typically among brands most impersonated.

"Microsoft's size and broad range of products and services means that many different types of phishing campaigns can be created to push all sorts of luring messages to fool victims," Sjouwerman says. "Phishers are also likely seizing on the popularity of Office 365 users who already use and trust Microsoft email as a daily part of their lives so that when a message is sent by someone pretending to be from Microsoft, some percentage of potential victims are more inclined to trust a message or suggested action than if it came from a brand that wasn't already part of their daily use."

The technology sector was the most likely targeted industry for brand phishing attacks, followed by banking and social networking sites, according to the Check Point report.

In a brand phishing attack, cybercriminals imitate the official website of a brand by using a similar domain name, or URL, and website design. They send the link to the fake website to targeted individuals via email or text message. The attackers can also redirect users during web browsing, or the brand phishing can get triggered from a fraudulent mobile application. On the mobile front specifically, the top brands imitated in Q3 were WhatsApp, PayPal, and Facebook.

"The top three mobile impersonated brands have a significantly higher proportion of end users who conduct the majority of their business with that brand over their mobile phones," Sjouwerman says. "For example, nearly all Instagram activity occurs over cell phones and very little via larger form-factor devices. So it intuitively makes sense that phishers would borrow the brands that are more closely tied to mobile devices to send mobile-based phishing."

6 Tips
As part of its Q3 report, Check Point offers the following six tips to security teams looking to educate their companies and employees about brand phishing attacks:

Learn the red flags: Certain characteristics can give away an attack via email. They include poor formatting, spelling and grammar mistakes, and generic greetings, such as "Dear user" or "Dear customer." Links should start with https:// (not http://), and  any email that conveys a sense of urgency or wants the user to respond quickly should be regarded with suspicion.

Avoid oversharing information: As a general rule, share the bare minimum, no matter what site is requesting information. Users never need to provide their Social Security numbers to conduct a transaction, and they never need to provide credentials to third parties. 

Delete suspicious emails: If something doesn't seem right, it probably isn't. Suspicious emails should be deleted without opening or clicking on any links, or forwarded them to the IT department for investigation.  

Don't click on attachments: Do not open attachments – especially Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or PDFs – in suspicious or strange emails.

Verify the sender: With every email received, take a good look at who sent it. Who or what is the source? Watch for misspellings or alterations in the email addresses of the email sender. Do not hesitate to block suspicious email senders via the email client. 

Keep all applications up-to-date: Make sure all apps on mobile phones and desktop and laptop computers have the latest software versions, which contain the latest vulnerability patches and defenses.

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience and has covered networking, security, and IT as a writer and editor since 1992. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
How SolarWinds Busted Up Our Assumptions About Code Signing
Dr. Jethro Beekman, Technical Director,  3/3/2021
News
'ObliqueRAT' Now Hides Behind Images on Compromised Websites
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  3/2/2021
News
Attackers Turn Struggling Software Projects Into Trojan Horses
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/26/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Sure you have fire, but he has an i7!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27314
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-05
SQL injection in admin.php in doctor appointment system 1.0 allows an unauthenticated attacker to insert malicious SQL queries via username parameter at login page.
CVE-2019-18630
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
On Xerox AltaLink B8045/B8055/B8065/B8075/B8090 and C8030/C8035/C8045/C8055/C8070 multifunction printers with software releases before 101.00x.099.28200, portions of the drive containing executable code were not encrypted thus leaving it open to potential cryptographic information disclosure.
CVE-2021-25344
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
Missing permission check in knox_custom service prior to SMR Mar-2021 Release 1 allows attackers to gain access to device's serial number without permission.
CVE-2021-25345
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
Graphic format mismatch while converting video format in hwcomposer prior to SMR Mar-2021 Release 1 results in kernel panic due to unsupported format.
CVE-2021-25346
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
A possible arbitrary memory overwrite vulnerabilities in quram library version prior to SMR Jan-2021 Release 1 allow arbitrary code execution.