Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Sprint Reveals Account Breach via Samsung Website

The last-June breach exposed data including names, phone numbers, and account numbers.

Sprint has been informing customers of a data breach discovered on June 22 that came by way of their account credentials via Samsung's "add a line" website. The number of customers impacted has not been disclosed.

Information exposed in the breach includes phone number, device type, device ID, monthly recurring charges, subscriber ID, account number, account creation date, upgrade eligibility, first and last name, billing address, and add-on services, according to Sprint's notification. The notification also stresses information that might be used in financial fraud was not affected.

"Suggesting this breach does not put users at risk of fraud or identity theft strikes me as either ignorant or disingenuous," counters Sam Bakken, senior product marketing manager at OneSpan. "Combining phone number, device type, and device ID, an attacker has the building blocks for an account-takeover scheme."

And that could have significant financial ramifications, says Tim Mackey, principal security strategist at Synopsys CyRC. "If a malicious actor has access to the appropriate provider information, they can co-opt the user's account either through the porting process or by simply obtaining a replacement SIM. These attacks are respectively known as 'port-out scams' and SIM-jacking," he explains.

Once those steps are taken, he says, many two-factor authentication schemes become weapons rather than protections. "Once ported, the replacement device will receive all cellular messages, such as SMS," Mackey says. "This can facilitate attacks where SMS is used as part of a two-factor identification strategy."

The most important information about this breach, according to Bob Maley, chief security officer at NormShield, is it's not the first Sprint has seen this year. "Earlier this year one of their subsidiaries, Boost Mobile, had a problem with a contractor," Maley says. According to the notification Sprint sent customers for that breach, which occurred March 14, "Boost.com experienced unauthorized online account activity in which an unauthorized person accessed your account through your Boost phone number and Boost.com PIN code."

"It sounds like [Sprint's] process for risk assessment for third parties might be lacking," Maley says. "As a CISO I'd want to know very early on when we engage a third party the sort of risk that engagement would bring to us. Are we sharing data with them? Will they have access to our systems or network? Is the service the third party providing critical to our operation?"  

Samsung would have said "yes" all three of those questions, Maley says, and so should fall under an enhanced schedule of monitoring and assessment for risk and security.

Many companies conduct risk assessment when a new third-party partner is onboarded but then fail to do regular reassessment of the risks, Maley says. "The 'trust but verify' model is good, but most people are just using the 'trust' part," he says.

This breach is a reminder that risks should be assessed and security practices audited on a regular basis, Maley adds. In a dynamic world, he points out, security is not a one-time affair.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/21/2019 | 6:35:46 PM
Continuous monitoring could help

Information exposed in the breach includes phone number, device type, device ID, monthly recurring charges, subscriber ID, account number, account creation date, upgrade eligibility, first and last name, billing address, and add-on services

This sounds like they pulled this information from a database, the "device ID or account no" sounds like the primary key. 

Schema (P = Primary, F = ForeignKey,


AcctNo (P) | FirstName | LastName | BillingAddr | PhoneNo


DeviceID (FK) | DeviceType


AddOnSvcs | UpgradeElig | CreationDate | MoRecurringChg


So they probably extracted a DB or a number of tables from different DBs, if the DB was configured with a single service account, it would have been easy to obtain this information but the question implies the B2B relationship is way more open than public exposure. The gentleman made a statement about Risk Assessment/Mgmt, there are a number of areas that could be identified to help.

  • Setup NAC (Network Access Control), only allow specific companies
  • Implement SELinux rules to allow access to certain parts of the accounting and data server
  • Implement security token that uses cryptographic keys to access certain features of the application
  • Install Attunity to replicate a stripped down DB with specific information that they need (create an external table that is considered a "Read-Only Replica" of a table or number of tables.
  • Segment the network to allow VPN access to their Zone extranet environment (IPv6 IPSec ESP/AH VPN access)

Todd
AI Is Everywhere, but Don't Ignore the Basics
Howie Xu, Vice President of AI and Machine Learning at Zscaler,  9/10/2019
Fed Kaspersky Ban Made Permanent by New Rules
Dark Reading Staff 9/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4147
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
IBM Sterling File Gateway 2.2.0.0 through 6.0.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 158413.
CVE-2019-5481
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
Double-free vulnerability in the FTP-kerberos code in cURL 7.52.0 to 7.65.3.
CVE-2019-5482
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
Heap buffer overflow in the TFTP protocol handler in cURL 7.19.4 to 7.65.3.
CVE-2019-15741
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
An issue was discovered in GitLab Omnibus 7.4 through 12.2.1. An unsafe interaction with logrotate could result in a privilege escalation
CVE-2019-16370
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-16
The PGP signing plugin in Gradle before 6.0 relies on the SHA-1 algorithm, which might allow an attacker to replace an artifact with a different one that has the same SHA-1 message digest, a related issue to CVE-2005-4900.