Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/11/2016
04:10 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Symantec Warns Of Second Group Targeting SWIFT Network

Those behind the Odinaff Trojan are using tools and infrastructure associated with the infamous Carbanak cybercrime group, security vendor says

Cybersecurity firm Symantec Corp. this week identified a group of malicious hackers targeting the SWIFT payments network in the same manner that another group did earlier this year when looting tens of millions of dollars in brazen online bank heists.

Since January this year, the newly identified group has been using a sophisticated Trojan called Odinaff to try and break into the networks of multiple organizations, many of them in the financial services and banking sectors. Organizations providing support services to these companies have also been targeted.

Evidence gathered about the Odinaff group shows that it has mounted attacks on users of SWIFT, Symantec said.

The Odinaff attacks are similar to those carried out by a cybercriminal group that stole $81 million from the Bangladesh central bank earlier this year by exploiting weaknesses in the interface between the banks’ systems and the SWIFT network.

In the earlier attacks, the threat actors used tools, associated with a cybercrime group called Lazarus, to initiate fraudulent money transfer transactions from target banks and then later to conceal evidence of the illegal activity. The same attacks were played out across multiple banks, resulting in considerable millions of dollars in losses for the target banks.

Symantec said it has found evidence showing the Odinaff group targeting SWIFT users as well as using malware to conceal fraudulent transactions. “The tools used are designed to monitor customers’ local message logs for keywords relating to certain transactions,” it said. “They will then move these logs out of customers’ local SWIFT software environment,” to conceal evidence of illegal activity.

Despite the similarity in approach, there is nothing to suggest that the Odinaff group is linked to the group that carried out the earlier attacks on the Bangladesh bank and other financial institutions, Symantec said.

The security vendor described Odinaff as malware used in the initial phase of an attack to gain a foothold on a target system and to provide a persistent presence on it. The malware is being used to install other sophisticated tools on compromised systems.

At least some of the tools and the rogue infrastructure that the Odinaff group is using are similar to tools used by the infamous Carbanak group that has long targeted financial institutions. “This new wave of attacks has also used some infrastructure that has previously been used in Carbanak campaigns,” Symantec said in its alert.

The Odinaff attacks that Symantec investigated appeared to require a large degree of hands-on effort and the deployment of purpose-built back doors and tools to target computers of specific interest to the operators of the campaign. The attackers appear to have invested heavily in developing, deploying, and coordinating the use of multiple tools during targeted attacks, Symantec said.

Jon DiMaggio, senior threat intelligence analyst with Symantec Security Response, says there are multiple similarities between the Odinaff and Carbanak operations to suggest a link between the two.

Aside from similar targets, three command-and-control (C&C) IP addresses have been connected to previously reported Carbanak campaigns, he says. One of them was used in an intrusion at Oracle’s MICROS POS network earlier this year - an attack that was linked to Carbanak. Russian and Cyrillic text in certain strings of the malware also suggest the operators of the two groups have the same origins, DiMaggio says.

“The Odinaff attackers could be part of Carbanak, but it is also possible that the two groups are only loosely affiliated.”

Related stories:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
How Attackers Infiltrate the Supply Chain & What to Do About It
Shay Nahari, Head of Red-Team Services at CyberArk,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10101
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
OECMS v4.3.R60321 and v4.3 later is affected by: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The impact is: The victim clicks on adding an administrator account. The component is: admincp.php. The attack vector is: network connectivity. The fixed version is: v4.3.
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
MailCleaner before c888fbb6aaa7c5f8400f637bcf1cbb844de46cd9 is affected by: Unauthenticated MySQL database password information disclosure. The impact is: MySQL database content disclosure (e.g. username, password). The component is: The API call in the function allowAction() in NewslettersControlle...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Open Information Security Foundation Suricata prior to version 4.1.3 is affected by: Denial of Service - TCP/HTTP detection bypass. The impact is: An attacker can evade a signature detection with a specialy formed sequence of network packets. The component is: detect.c (https://github.com/OISF/suric...
CVE-2019-13959
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
In Bento4 1.5.1-627, AP4_DataBuffer::SetDataSize does not handle reallocation failures, leading to a memory copy into a NULL pointer. This is different from CVE-2018-20186.
CVE-2019-13960
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
** DISPUTED ** In libjpeg-turbo 2.0.2, a large amount of memory can be used during processing of an invalid progressive JPEG image containing incorrect width and height values in the image header. NOTE: the vendor's expectation, for use cases in which this memory usage would be a denial of service, ...