Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

5/29/2019
12:35 PM
50%
50%

WannaCry Lives On in 145K Infected Devices

Data from the last half year shows devices worldwide infected with the self-propagating ransomware, putting organizations with poor patching initiatives at risk.

Two years after the WannaCry ransomware attack blitzed through major organizations and shut down manufacturing and operations, the malware still exists on an estimated 145,000 devices, continuing to attempt to spread to unpatched versions of Microsoft Windows.

Internet of Things security vendor Armis over a six-month period collected data from honeypots and DNS cache servers and found that number of devices remain infected with the WannaCry ransomware. And nearly 60% of manufacturing and 40% of healthcare organizations have had at least one device compromised by WannaCry, the company found.

The continued success of WannaCry is mainly due to unpatched versions of Microsoft Windows that are embedded in hard-to-update industrial and enterprise devices, says Ben Seri, vice president of research at Armis.

"Often these systems are set up when the device—whether manufacturing, a healthcare, or retail—is delivered and the company does not want to update it, because they are concerned that doing so can lead to business disruption," says Seri, whose company today published its WannaCry data.

WannaCry has successfully attacked an average of 3,500 systems per hour worldwide over the past six months.

WannaCry first started spreading on May 12, 2017, infecting Microsoft Windows systems using an exploit stolen from the National Security Agency—known as EternalBlue—that targeted a vulnerability that had been patched by Microsoft two months before. The ransomware attack propagated on its own, placing it in the class of programs known as a worm, and quickly spread to 74 countries in the early hours of the attack.

The attack hit healthcare systems and manufacturers the hardest, as they had Microsoft Windows embedded in critical operations and information technology that the organizations needed to continue to operate. The attack disrupted the U.K.'s National Health Service, causing surgery delays and cancelled appointments. FedEx service faced disruptions and auto manufacturers such as Nissan and Renault suffered from the attack.

"In industrial networks, much of the security of the organization relies on segmentation of the network—which is good and you should do that—but once WannaCry gets in, the infection spreads quickly," Seri says.

Armis took a census of the current WannaCry population by using a network of honeypot servers to register the source of attack traffic. More than 145,000 devices appeared to be compromised with WannaCry at some point during the past six months. The company attempted to take into account systems behind routers that can sometimes appear as multiple systems due to the dynamic assignation of IP addresses.  

In addition, the company studied DNS traffic for signs of any requests to thee kill switch—a domain that WannaCry attempts to contact following an infection, and whose existence will be a signal to the program to stop its attempts at infection. The company examined more than 10,000 DNS servers in 120 countries to determine how many requests were made to the kill switch. The data suggests that vulnerable systems are still being infected with the original version of WannaCry - which checks for the kill switch - at a rate of roughly one compromise per second.

Companies and organizations that have systems with embedded versions of Microsoft Windows are at greater risk of WannaCry because those systems are often not regularly updated, Armis' Seri says. In many cases, the manufacturers of that equipment don't provide regular updates. In other cases, the organization does not have specific patch windows to apply software updates.

To make matters worse, the companies often also lack additional security, he says. "These reasons are also the reason many of them don't run any endpoint security, and thus are even more likely to be compromised by WannaCry, or similar malware," he wrote in an analysis posted to Armis' site.

An interesting anomaly in the data is that a relatively small country, Vietnam, accounts for more than 10% of the attacks, according to Armis. The issue for companies in the country is that Internet service providers block attempts to connect to the kill-switch domain, removing that safety net and leading to a higher number of infections. 

Armis found that healthcare organizations, manufacturers, and retail companies have high rates of older versions of Windows, with at least 60% of computers in each industry running Windows 7 or older.

The first step for companies is to gain continuous and consistent visibility into their networks and what devices are connected and operation systems are running, Seri says.

"This is not something that you do once in a while," he says. "You need to continuously know what is running and what is vulnerable."

Related Content:

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Intel Issues Fix for 'Plundervolt' SGX Flaw
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...