Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud Security

12/26/2017
08:55 AM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

Cloud Security Is a Shared Responsibility

In the answer to a question from a recent webinar, editor Curtis Franklin looks at who's responsible for data security in the cloud.

Here at Security Now, webinars are interactive affairs. In our most recent webinar, we had some great questions, including a couple that we couldn't answer in the time allowed. Here's the first of the questions along with our answer for everyone in the community to see.

In our Look Forward to CyberSecurity in 2018, Gary asked:

If we are going to move more critical applications and the data accessed, produced and stored -- will encryption capabilities become critical? And would anyone really outsource this function to AWS? Many people think AWS and Azure are taking responsibility for your apps and data when you move them to the cloud -- are they really going to "add this" via their service offerings?

The question of who takes responsibility for your applications and data is a critical issue when moving to a cloud infrastructure. Cloud providers have tried to bring some discipline to the question of who's responsible for what through the shared responsibility model of security. Stated most succinctly, this states that the cloud provider is responsible for the security of the cloud infrastructure (including the services and applications they're contracted to provide) while the customer is responsible for the security of the data that runs through the infrastructure.

Amazon was the first major cloud provider to publish a formal statement of their policy on AWS. Their language draws a distinction between the security of the cloud and the security of what's in the cloud. It's a useful distinction that helps clarify the pieces that fall under each definition.

Of course, Amazon has not been alone in drawing the distinction: Microsoft has also released information on the shared security model as applied to Azure. Google also has a paper explaining their security model, though it goes into more detail on the tools they provide to help customers with their responsibilities.

When you strip away all the explanations and jargon, the lesson to be learned in all of these papers and posts is that going to the cloud doesn't mean that you can forget about security. No cloud provider is stepping up to assume responsibility for your data's security -- that's still your job.

The fact that it's your job means that you may need to bring new tools and strategies to bear on data that no longer lives within the cozy confines of your network boundary. These tools, which range from micro-segmentation to CASB, should be deployed in consultation with your cloud provider so that you're certain neither of you is stepping on the other's toes in the name of security.

If you're interested in the other questions and answers from the webinar, as well as the editors' takes on the stories we're likely to be talking about in 2018, it's not too late to listen to the webinar. You've got time to ask your own questions, too -- just leave them as comments to this article or the next article answering questions from the event. And keep your eyes open for our next editorial webinar, coming to Security Now in January 2018!

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cloud Security Threats for 2021
Or Azarzar, CTO & Co-Founder of Lightspin,  12/3/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27772
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in coders/bmp.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned int`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could po...
CVE-2020-27773
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/gem-private.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned char` or division by zero. This would most likely lead to an impact to appli...
CVE-2020-28950
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
The installer of Kaspersky Anti-Ransomware Tool (KART) prior to KART 4.0 Patch C was vulnerable to a DLL hijacking attack that allowed an attacker to elevate privileges during installation process.
CVE-2020-27774
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/statistic.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of a too large shift for 64-bit type `ssize_t`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but co...
CVE-2020-27775
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/quantum.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type unsigned char. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but c...