Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


10:00 AM
Eric Olden
Eric Olden
Connect Directly
E-Mail vvv

5 Steps for Implementing Multicloud Identity

Why embracing, not fighting, decentralization will pave the way to smoother cloud migrations.

According to the "RightScale State of the Cloud" report, virtually every company (84%) that uses infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) or platform-as-a-service (PaaS) clouds uses more than one provider. Most employ three or more public clouds from leading providers such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP).

There are a number of trends driving this multicloud proliferation, including the need for greater agility, flexibility and scalability, better network performance, improved risk management, avoiding vendor lock-in, and getting more-competitive pricing.

Each of these cloud platforms uses a different, built-in identity system that creates separate silos. Meanwhile, identity-as-a-service (IdaaS) solutions that manage access to SaaS apps introduce yet another separate identity store. Despite this accelerating cloud adoption, many organizations still run the majority of their critical business applications on-premises using a hybrid model, creating even more identity silos.

As a result, the coexistence of multicloud and hybrid clouds introduce an inherently distributed architecture that spans multiple platforms and identity systems. This "new normal" is transformational, not incrementally different from what came before.

Adopting a Distributed Security Model
The challenges associated with implementing security that can span multicloud and hybrid-cloud architectures is being complicated by the fact that identity has become the new security perimeter because many users are accessing apps and data from outside of the firewall. 

Initially, many organizations try to set up multicloud infrastructures manually but quickly discover that identity management efforts don't scale due to a lack of staff and expertise, which results in misconfiguration errors, slow process times, and increased costs. In addition, most organizations have significant investments in legacy systems they must maintain while migrating to new cloud infrastructures. This will require IT departments to support a mix of cloud and on-premises apps for the foreseeable future, further complicating the multicloud challenge.

Here are five steps that will lead organizations to the creation and implementation of a successful multicloud identity strategy.

Step 1: Embrace Decentralization
The best way to solve multicloud identity problems is with a distributed architecture. Orchestration software can be used to serve as a connectivity "fabric" between cloud and on-premises identity systems and unify policy management and enforcement.

Step 2: Modernize! Don't Migrate Legacy Infrastructure
Don't move messy identity silos as part of migration projects. Instead, upgrade and modernize identity capabilities with new identity-as-a-service options. This makes it possible to consolidate policies and simplify roles and groups, check for compromised credentials, lock out dormant accounts, and force users to securely reactivate their accounts.

Step 3: Unify Visibility into App and Identity Ecosystems
To effectively implement a new identity strategy, it's important to understand where existing apps and identity systems are located. What are the dependencies between each app and identity systems? What identity workflows exist today and who has access to what? Having the right tools can speed up and streamline this discovery and mapping process.

Step 4: Use Standards, Not APIs, for Integration
Avoid lock-in to proprietary systems or writing to outdated APIs when updating identity systems. Instead, use standards like SAML, OIDC, and SCIM. Rather than performing multiple 1:1 integrations, an abstraction layer can provide 1-to-any flexibility. This approach also eliminates the need to rewrite apps in order for them to interoperate with a new identity system.

Step 5: Develop a Phased Migration Plan
A complex migration is made easier by breaking it into smaller, more manageable phases. For example, grouping migrations and planning an incremental shift will minimize disruption and risk. Grouping apps in terms of their migration complexity also helps anticipate and plan for potential speed bumps during a migration, for example:

  • Complex = Cookie-based sessions and IAM SDKs
  • Medium = HTTP headers and custom attributes
  • Simple = SAML and OIDC standards-based sessions.

Review the capabilities you currently use that can be carried forward and determine what new capabilities will be needed to support the multicloud environment. There will be some level of coexistence support required until all legacy infrastructure can be decommissioned. Finally, calculate the costs that will be saved by retiring legacy infrastructure, which can be earmarked to fund other innovations.

Related Content:

Learn from industry experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation about how to prepare for that "really bad day" in cybersecurity. Click for more information and to register for this On-Demand event. 

Eric has made a career out of simplifying and securing enterprise identity management. He founded, scaled, and successfully exited both Securant/ClearTrust (Web Access Management) and Symplified, (the first IDaaS company). Recently Eric served as SVP and GM at Oracle, where ... View Full Bio

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel function where a lack of checks allows the exploitation of an integer overflow on the size parameter of the tz_map_shared_mem function.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel�s tz_handle_trusted_app_smc function where a lack of integer overflow checks on the req_off and param_ofs variables leads to memory corruption of critical kernel structures.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel where an integer overflow in the tz_map_shared_mem function can bypass boundary checks, which might lead to denial of service.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in TSEC TA which deserializes the incoming messages even though the TSEC TA does not expose any command. This vulnerability might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution, causing information disclosure.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in all TAs whose deserializer does not reject messages with multiple occurrences of the same parameter. The deserialization of untrusted data might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution.