Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

5/29/2019
04:32 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

FS-ISAC Survey: Nearly 75 Percent of Financial Institutions CISOs Plan to Ask for an Increase in Cybersecurity Investment

Only four percent of financial institutions prioritize employee education and training in existing budgets

Reston, VA (May 29, 2019) – The Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center (FS-ISAC), an industry consortium dedicated to reducing cyber-risk in the global financial system, said that some 73 percent of Chief Information and Security Officers (CISOs) of financial institutions plan to ask their organization’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for an increase in cybersecurity investments in the next year. 

“The advancement and adoption of new technologies coupled with increased geopolitical tension has fueled a rapidly evolving cyber-threat landscape,” said Steve Silberstein, Chief Executive Officer of FS-ISAC. “An effective cybersecurity program needs to adapt to this environment and funding must be deemed as a cross-functional investment.”

The survey also found that 56 percent of the respondents said 10 percent or less of their organization’s overall budget is dedicated to cybersecurity. Of that 10 percent, a majority (54 percent) cited IT infrastructure and asset management as the area that receives the most funding. The three areas that receive the least amount of funding include employee training and education (four percent), vendor management (six percent) and business continuity (nine percent). 

“Institutions are now finding vulnerabilities across other functions of the business with employees and third-party vendors becoming areas of increasing concern,” said Silberstein. “A holistic approach to cyber is critical to mitigate current and long-term risks.”

FS-ISAC conducted the survey of more than 300 CISOs of financial institutions at its Annual Summit in Orlando, Florida on April 28-May 1, 2019 to gauge industry sentiment and changes on cybersecurity budget allocations. 

Additional key findings include:

  • Of the total cybersecurity budget, 27 percent of respondents surveyed cited regulatory requirements (14 percent) and risk management and governance (13 percent) as areas that receive the most funding within their organization. 
  • Seventy-one percent said their organization’s incident response plan is tested across the organization once a year, compared to 29 percent that reported that it is only tested within the IT environment once a year.
  • Seventeen percent of respondents said they also plan to ask to expand their cybersecurity budget by 2021.

 

Note to Editors

FS-ISAC conducted the survey at its 2019 Annual Summit in Orlando, Florida from April 28 to May 1. The survey gauged industry sentiment and shifting expectations on cybersecurity funding and investment. Percentages are based on a total of 301 responses. 

 

About FS-ISAC

The Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center (FS-ISAC) is an industry consortium dedicated to reducing cyber-risk in the global financial system. Serving financial institutions and in turn their customers, the organization leverages its intelligence platform, resiliency resources, and a trusted peer-to-peer network of experts to anticipate, mitigate and respond to cyberthreats. FS-ISAC has nearly 7,000-member firms with users in more than 70 countries. Headquartered in the US, the organization has offices in the UK and Singapore. To learn more, visitwww.fsisac.com.

 

Contacts for Media:

 

Meredith Zaritheny, Prosek Partners

646.818.9251

[email protected]

# # #

 

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Tor Weaponized to Steal Bitcoin
Dark Reading Staff 10/18/2019
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
State of SMB Insecurity by the Numbers
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/17/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18281
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-23
An out-of-bounds memory access in the generateDirectionalRuns() function in qtextengine.cpp in Qt qtbase 5.11.x and 5.12.x before 5.12.5 allows attackers to cause a denial of service by crashing an application via a text file containing many directional characters.
CVE-2019-18344
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-23
Sourcecodester Online Grading System 1.0 is vulnerable to unauthenticated SQL injection and can allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the student, instructor, department, room, class, or user page (id or classid parameter).
CVE-2019-16976
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-23
In FusionPBX up to 4.5.7, the file app\destinations\destination_imports.php uses an unsanitized "query_string" variable coming from the URL, which is reflected on 2 occasions in HTML, leading to XSS.
CVE-2019-18219
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-23
Sitemagic CMS 4.4.1 is affected by a Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, as it fails to validate user input. The affected components (index.php, upgrade.php) allow for JavaScript injection within both GET or POST requests, via a crafted URL or via the UpgradeMode POST parameter.
CVE-2019-18220
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-23
Sitemagic CMS 4.4.1 is affected by a Cross-Site-Request-Forgery (CSRF) issue as it doesn't implement any method to validate incoming requests, allowing the execution of critical functionalities via spoofed requests. This behavior could be abused by a remote unauthenticated attacker to trick Sitemagi...