Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

6/1/2010
11:08 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Quit Facebook Day A Bust

Fewer than 40,000 account holders, citing privacy and other concerns, pledged to drop the social networking site.

After weeks of anticipation and attention from bloggers and online pundits, Monday's Quit Facebook Day generated a paltry showing. Only 34,388 pledges by account holders promised to drop the social networking site -- about 0.00637% of Facebook's more than 540 million users worldwide.

Although relatively few quit Facebook, it was not because they forgot the date. Many people tweeted about the day, often poking fun at the concept in general.

"It's Quit Facebook Day? Gosh, it comes round so quickly doesn't it? I've not even got my decorations up," tweeted Mark Watson, a London-based comic and writer.

The movement, founded by technologist Joseph Dee and systems designer Matthew Milan, had 780 pledges on May 15. As of Tuesday morning, 6,937 people liked the "Quit Facebook Day" page on Facebook, compared with about 1,500 on May 17 -- but still a minute percentage of the universe of Facebook users estimated by Google.

"For a lot of people, quitting Facebook revolves around privacy. This is a legitimate concern, but we also think the privacy issue is just the symptom of a larger set of issues," wrote Milan and Dee. "The cumulative effects of what Facebook does now will not play out well in the future, and we care deeply about the future of the Web as an open, safe and human place. We just can't see Facebook's current direction being aligned with any positive future for the Web, so we're leaving."

It is unclear what, if any, effect this will have on FacebookProtest.com, scheduled for June 6. It has 1,979 followers on Twitter and 4,156 fans on Facebook and asks adherents to log out on June 5 and to refrain from connecting or clicking any "like" buttons on June 6, according to the site.

Last week, Facebook said it planned to roll out simplified privacy controls designed to give users more control over their information. Under the new plan, Facebook will provide one menu with three settings that determine whether content can be viewed by friends, friends of friends, or everyone. This setting will apply to past, present, or future content.

"Facebook's users have spoken and made it clear that they want control of their information," said Leslie Harris, president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, in a statement. "Despite all rumors to the contrary, privacy is not dead, it is on its way to a comeback in the form of simplified controls and better policies. While more work still needs to be done, these changes are the building blocks for giving people what they want and deserve."

pledged to drop the social networking site.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
10 iOS Security Tips to Lock Down Your iPhone
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11949
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
testserver.cgi of the web service on VIVOTEK Network Cameras before XXXXX-VVTK-2.2002.xx.01x (and before XXXXX-VVTK-0XXXX_Beta2) allows an authenticated user to obtain arbitrary files from a camera's local filesystem. For example, this affects IT9388-HT devices.
CVE-2020-11950
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
VIVOTEK Network Cameras before XXXXX-VVTK-2.2002.xx.01x (and before XXXXX-VVTK-0XXXX_Beta2) allows an authenticated user to upload and execute a script (with resultant execution of OS commands). For example, this affects IT9388-HT devices.
CVE-2020-13645
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
In GNOME glib-networking through 2.64.2, the implementation of GTlsClientConnection skips hostname verification of the server's TLS certificate if the application fails to specify the expected server identity. This is in contrast to its intended documented behavior, to fail the certificate verificat...
CVE-2020-13643
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The live editor feature did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The live_editor_panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be e...
CVE-2020-13644
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-28
An issue was discovered in the Accordion plugin before 2.2.9 for WordPress. The unprotected AJAX wp_ajax_accordions_ajax_import_json action allowed any authenticated user with Subscriber or higher permissions the ability to import a new accordion and inject malicious JavaScript as part of the accord...