Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

10/20/2016
05:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

How To Crash A Drone By Hacking Its 3D Propeller Design

Researchers from Israel's Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and two other universities show how attackers can exploit 3D manufacturing processes.

Researchers at Israel's Ben-Gurion University of the Negev along with their counterparts at the University of South Alabama and the Singapore University of Technology and Design have demonstrated how attackers can cause fatal equipment failures by sabotaging the integrity of 3D-printed parts.

In a proof-of-concept exploit described in a technical paper and video released this week, the researchers crashed a $1,000 quadcopter by manipulating the design of a 3D-printed replacement propeller used by the drone.

For the demonstration, the researchers simulated how an attacker might use a standard email phishing lure to gain access to the computer used to control the 3D printing of replacement drone-propellers - and drop malware on it.

The malware would let the threat actor break into the system, search for the blueprint for the propeller, download and alter it, and then swap out the original design file with the doctored one.

For the proof-of-concept exploit, the researchers inserted sub millimeter-scale internal cavities - or voids - in the design of the propeller so it would deteriorate more quickly than normal under operational conditions yet appear intact when inspected visually.

When the weakened propeller is then used in the drone, it fails quickly, causing the aircraft to crash.

The exploit is designed to expose the threats manufacturing companies face from the increasing use of additive printing, aka 3D printing, for functional parts in manufactured equipment, the researchers said in a statement.

"With the growth of additive manufacturing worldwide, we believe the ability to conduct malicious sabotage of these systems will attract the attention of many adversaries, ranging from criminal gangs to state actors," said Yuval Elovici, a member of the team that developed the exploit.

More than 100 industries, including aerospace, defense, and automotive currently use 3D-printed parts to varying degrees in their products, the statement noted.

The new exploit is not the first to demonstrate the vulnerability of 3D-printed parts to such tampering. Other researchers have already discussed the possibility of modifying the design files for 3D printers and of modifying manufacturing parameters like the temperature of the extruder in certain types of 3D printers, notes Mark Yampolskiy, assistant professor at the University of South Alabama’s School of Computing.

But prior research has focused mainly on the reduction of mechanical properties, like the tensile strength of a 3D manufactured object, so it would fail when put into operation.

"Our proposal introduces defects that increase fatigue," Yampolskiy says. "This means that parts will not immediately break under operational conditions - and can pass mechanical tests."

The proof-of-concept shows how an attacker can introduce a defect that causes fatigue to develop faster in a functional part, causing it to break, he says.

The technical paper is unique in that it presents a full chain of attack on an additive manufacturing process. It starts with a cyberattack on the system with the design files and continues through malicious modification of the file, and manufacture of the compromised part, he says.

And unlike previous attacks that have targeted specific printer models, this research is the first one that is close to universally applicable to any 3D printer, according to the reserachers.

The likelihood of this type of attack depends on a variety of factors. Typically, a professional 3D printer used for additive manufacturing is unlikely to be directly connected to the Internet, Yampolskiy says. So while direct attacks on such systems might be hard to pull off, the systems can still be accessed indirectly via other computers with which they might be connected.

"In this paper, we have tried to analyze whether an adversary with a limited sophistication can perform such an attack. And the answer is – as scary as it is – yes," he says.

Related stories

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ryanwillson
50%
50%
ryanwillson,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/11/2018 | 2:04:20 AM
3D printing hack
Imagine that an adversary can sabotage functional parts employed in an airplane's jet engines. Such an attack could cost lives, cause economic loss, disrupt industry, and threaten a country's national security,

 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/1/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Well I dont run on MacOS, so I need to take extra precautions"
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13759
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
rust-vmm vm-memory before 0.1.1 and 0.2.x before 0.2.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (loss of IP networking) because read_obj and write_obj do not properly access memory. This affects aarch64 (with musl or glibc) and x86_64 (with musl).
CVE-2020-7662
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
websocket-extensions npm module prior to 1.0.4 allows Denial of Service (DoS) via Regex Backtracking. The extension parser may take quadratic time when parsing a header containing an unclosed string parameter value whose content is a repeating two-byte sequence of a backslash and some other characte...
CVE-2020-7663
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
websocket-extensions ruby module prior to 0.1.5 allows Denial of Service (DoS) via Regex Backtracking. The extension parser may take quadratic time when parsing a header containing an unclosed string parameter value whose content is a repeating two-byte sequence of a backslash and some other charact...
CVE-2020-12017
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
GE Grid Solutions Reason RT Clocks, RT430, RT431, and RT434, all firmware versions prior to 08A05. The device’s vulnerability in the web application could allow multiple unauthenticated attacks that could cause serious impact. The vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated attacke...
CVE-2018-18623
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
Grafana 5.3.1 has XSS via the "Dashboard > Text Panel" screen. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-12099.