Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint //

Privacy

3/21/2019
10:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

What the Transition to Smart Cards Can Teach the US Healthcare Industry

Healthcare information security suffers from the inherent weakness of using passwords to guard information. Chip-based smart cards could change that.

Given the copious amounts of sensitive data coursing through the US healthcare system, strong information security remains a high-stakes requirement for all players in the industry. Among the most obvious problem areas, healthcare information security currently suffers from the inherent weakness of using passwords to guard information access. Passwords remain an easy attack vector because humans pick easy-to-remember — and therefore hackable — words or phrases.

However, hope is on the horizon. Technology vendors and organizations are collaborating toward making a password-less future. But meanwhile, industries that store and share personally identifiable information can activate multifactor authentication (MFA) to buttress password protection. Given the successful rollout of chip-based cards for US consumer payments in the past few years, this form factor might be the best candidate for implementing MFA in healthcare.

Chip-based "smart" cards have become ubiquitous in the US since the middle of 2015, when they were distributed by payments issuers to combat the spike in data breaches and the resulting credit card fraud. This transition has reduced fraud, proved the sector can self-regulate and adapt to new systems, and demonstrated that American consumers will incorporate this form factor into routine practice. With three years' evidence, it's time we apply the lessons learned from financial services' smart card implementation to secure access to medical records and other sensitive information of high interest to cybercriminals.

Reduce fraud: In the US healthcare sector, fraud, waste, and abuse are persistent problems. This begins with patient enrollment and continues with subsequent redundant information entry that is sometimes complicated by language barriers and improper patient identification. The adoption of a chip-based system for healthcare services provides an avenue to make things more efficient. For instance, a chip-based system would greatly improve the accuracy of data capture. In addition, the chip can ensure HIPAA compliance and increase the difficulty for medical identity theft to take place in a physical setting in which care is being provided. This will also lead to an accurate view of consumption.

Invite self-regulation: Financial services and healthcare are among the most regulated industries in the US, with a combination of governmental and self-regulating organizations (SROs). The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are examples of government regulators, while Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council are influential SROs. Healthcare, currently regulated primarily by government bodies, could accelerate stronger security practices by incorporating industry bodies that have a financial and ethical responsibility to protect access to sensitive information, including patient data, research results, and other proprietary information. Giving hospitals, insurance providers, and other medical players a stake in industry practices could speed implementation and result in a better outcome in the long run.

Change industry relationships: Like the tension between merchants and card providers in the payments industry, a similar tension exists in the US healthcare system. While employers and the government bear much of the costs, the actual "payment" is typically processed through insurance companies. Financial services implemented changes by reversing previous policies regarding how fraud liability was handled; under the new chip-card way of working, card issuers covered fraudulent charges in situations in which merchants had adopted point-of-sale technology that allowed chip-based cards to be used. Healthcare could similarly drive change by mandating providers integrate point-of-care terminals or otherwise looking for a parallel from the financial services industry. When insurers negotiate prices with healthcare providers, they could expedite payments for those using chip-based cards or add fees for those providers not implementing chip-based cards.

Change consumer habits: The way that hundreds of millions of US consumers relatively quickly adopted to the move to chip-based cards holds promise for the US healthcare industry. Moreover, many American consumers now understand that the chip provides a stronger level of both security and fraud prevention than previously existed. This prepares the way for the healthcare sector to adopt chip-based cards. As a way to implement stronger identity protection, portability, and tracking, the equivalent chip for our health data could become a reality via our insurance cards in a manner that moves patient data with greater veracity and velocity.

Chip-based cards hold the potential to solve many of the ongoing problems in the US healthcare sector, and consumers are already accustomed to using this technology as result of implementation in the payments industry. The time is right to bring smart chip cards into the healthcare security equation.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Joram Borenstein, General Manager of Microsoft's Cybersecurity Solutions Group Joram Borenstein is the General Manager of Microsoft's Cybersecurity Solutions Group, holds CISSP and CISA certifications. He has been on the Advisory Board of numerous cybersecurity startups, ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Yenrab
50%
50%
Yenrab,
User Rank: Strategist
3/24/2019 | 9:12:13 AM
So NOW we think this is a good idea
If memory serves, was not Microsoft (not always security wizards) reccomending smart card usage back in 2000?  The Win2K training manuals for Server suggested using them that long ago.  Nice to see that their advice is finaly being heeded.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.