Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

1/18/2017
02:30 PM
Todd Thibodeaux
Todd Thibodeaux
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

What CISOs Need To Know Before Adopting Biometrics

Biometric techniques offer a solution to the password problem, but getting started can be tough. Here are a few things you need to know.

Businesses have long sought a better way to balance end-user security and usability, and it's clear the password-only model needs to change.

Faced with employees who are unwilling to remember more than a handful of unique passwords despite using dozens of different devices, services, and platforms, organizations have thrown their weight behind biometric authentication. Fingerprints, voice, and retina patterns — which are hard to fake and impossible to forget — promise an escape from poor end-user security habits.

Laying the Groundwork for Biometric Authentication
With myriad off-the-shelf solutions and potential approaches to implementing biometric authentication, it can be difficult to know where to start. Here are a three considerations CISOs should keep in mind while planning their organization's transition:

1. Biometric data is personally identifiable information. It's always important for organizations to protect their users' passwords, but biometric authentication data presents an extra layer of complexity. Not only is biometric data used to access sensitive or confidential resources, it is valuable in its own right. In fact, organizations that contract with the U.S. government are often required to submit to the personally identifiable information management practices outlined in the Privacy Act of 1974, but states can and do pass more stringent regulations in a patchwork of security breach notification laws. For example, California's SB 1386 requires organizations to notify individuals when PII is believed to be compromised.

Before fully adopting biometric authentication, IT leaders must carefully consider how PII will be stored and used. A fingerprint reader installed on a workstation is less risky than biometric authentication passed over a network, for example, but biometric tokenization can largely eliminate this weakness. Organizations should focus on securing devices that will store biometric data through measures such as encryption, adoption of trusted platform modules in client machines to prevent data theft, and other physical security measures.

2. Passwords still have a place. Although biometric authentication promises to make users less reliant on passwords, it's limited in its ability to fully supplant them. Even ignoring the legal and ethical complexities introduced by biometric authentication, a breach can permanently render biometric data unusable from a security standpoint. A password, once compromised, can be changed, but the same can't be said of fingerprints, hand geometry, and retina patterns.

At the same time, biometric authentication isn't 100% reliable. Where no modern system will reject a correct password, every biometric authentication configuration must account for some level of false negatives and positives. Especially in highly secure environments, false positives may present an unacceptable risk, while false negatives require a fallback authentication mechanism such as a traditional password. CISOs planning to adopt biometric authentication must ensure that biometric credentials are issued in addition to, not in place of, traditional passwords.

3. Protecting data through redundancy. Organizations planning to deploy biometric authentication on any large scale must include data loss prevention in their implementation from the beginning. This is true not only of biometric data transmitted by users but also of the data they intend to access. To prevent the loss of biometric data, organizations should invest in high-availability authentication servers, using technology such as load balancing to ensure high demand doesn't prevent end users from authenticating. IT leaders must also consider ways to protect the data end users wish to access. Since any single form of biometric authentication could report a false positive, organizations should make sure that sensitive systems can use multiple biometric sources in tandem, such as both facial and fingerprint recognition.

A More-Secure Future
Biometrics may not solve all poor end-user security practices, but the right strategy can help organizations seriously address the shortcomings of their existing password use. In an ideal implementation, biometrics can serve as a quicker, more convenient access solution for end users while enabling multifactor authentication and more robust security. Businesses may need to invest in additional capabilities to meet logistical and regulatory demands, but it's clear that passwords alone aren't enough.

Related Content:

Todd Thibodeaux is the president and chief executive officer of the Computing Technology Industry Association, the leading trade association representing the business interests of the global information technology industry. He is responsible for leading strategy, development ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Breaches Are Inevitable, So Embrace the Chaos
Ariel Zeitlin, Chief Technology Officer & Co-Founder, Guardicore,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13581
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A heap-based buffer overflow allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary ...
CVE-2019-13582
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A stack overflow could lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2019-6659
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
On version 14.0.0-14.1.0.1, BIG-IP virtual servers with TLSv1.3 enabled may experience a denial of service due to undisclosed incoming messages.
CVE-2019-6660
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, and 13.1.0-13.1.1, undisclosed HTTP requests may consume excessive amounts of systems resources which may lead to a denial of service.
CVE-2019-6661
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
When the BIG-IP APM 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, or 11.5.1-11.6.5 system processes certain requests, the APD/APMD daemon may consume excessive resources.