Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

1/21/2011
07:08 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Five Ways To Get Rational About Risk

Seat of the pants is no way to prioritize security spending and set project precedence. But that's exactly how some CISOs are doing business.

Don't Gut It Out
Don't Gut It Out
It's no secret that some companies excel at information security while others run around stamping out fires and never get ahead. What's the secret of first-rate IT risk managers? To find out, we interviewed a half-dozen CISOs from various industries. We didn't talk about specific types of threats. Rather, we wanted to understand exactly how these successful security leaders prioritize money and manpower.

One thing we all have in common is data overload. Infosec leaders have their go-to sources for cyberintelligence, like vendors, newsgroups, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and regulatory bodies. But at some point, we all find ourselves overwhelmed. Call it the "needle in a needle stack" conundrum: You know there's a ton of threats out there, many of them potentially damaging to your company, but if you pick the wrong needle at the wrong time, the stack may just fall and cause death by a thousand cuts.

And there are plenty of reasons a CISO might select the wrong needle.

We'll admit that the media doesn't always help. Early last year, my phone was ringing off the hook after the Google attacks, with information security pros asking whether APT--advanced persistent threat--was the most immediate danger to their companies. Now, data loss prevention and distributed denial of service are back in the spotlight, courtesy of WikiLeaks.

We're also all over the map with risk assessments. Every company we reviewed had some type of risk management framework, but the devil is in the details. We saw no uniform best practices. Our recent InformationWeek Analytics IT Risk Management Survey, available later this month, shows that the most popular way to measure risk, by far, is qualitative categorization of high, medium, or low. In our experience, some companies have rudimentary internal risk assessment systems, supplemented by an external vendor or third party, such as Gartner. On the other end of the spectrum are companies that deploy extensive, 50-plus-question surveys and use a stringent, quantitative approach where every response has a weight; the overall tally denotes a project's risk. Fewer than half of our survey respondents, all of whom play roles in assessing risk at their companies, use such a quantitative method.

What's interesting is that the CISOs we spoke with agree that neither a quantitative nor a qualitative approach is much help with prioritization. Quantitative risk analysis is not the be-all and end-all--just because a risk is scored at 98 out of 100 doesn't mean it will be remediated. For one thing, the business significantly influences whether to spend money. And most surprising to us, in the end, many CISOs say they ignore vendor input, media reports, pundit white papers, even all their own data and make gut decisions.

Let's be clear: Gut decisions aren't useful. Very often they're based on a confirmation bias--the tendency for people to favor information that confirms their preconceptions or hypotheses, regardless of whether the information is true. If you have a confirmation bias and think laptop theft is the largest concern, whether it is or not, you'll find a way to get encryption to be the highest-priority project.

Five Ways to Get Rational About Risk


Become an InformationWeek Analytics subscriber and get our full report on reducing security data overload. This report includes 13 pages of action-oriented analysis. What you'll find:
  • Why you need an emergency risk assessment process
  • Exclusive sneak peek at results of our risk management poll
Get This And All Our Reports


Michael A. Davis has been privileged to help shape and educate the globalcommunity on the evolution of IT security. His portfolio of clients includes international corporations such as AT&T, Sears, and Exelon as well as the U.S. Department of Defense. Davis's early embrace of ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 4
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
9 Tips to Prepare for the Future of Cloud & Network Security
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/28/2020
Malware Attacks Declined But Became More Evasive in Q2
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-12505
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
Improper Authentication vulnerability in WAGO 750-8XX series with FW version <= FW07 allows an attacker to change some special parameters without authentication. This issue affects: WAGO 750-852 version FW07 and prior versions. WAGO 750-880/xxx-xxx version FW07 and prior versions. WAGO 750-881 ve...
CVE-2020-12506
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
Improper Authentication vulnerability in WAGO 750-8XX series with FW version <= FW03 allows an attacker to change the settings of the devices by sending specifically constructed requests without authentication This issue affects: WAGO 750-362 version FW03 and prior versions. WAGO 750-363 version ...
CVE-2020-4629
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a local user with specialized access to obtain sensitive information from a detailed technical error message. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 185370.
CVE-2019-17098
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
Use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability in August Connect Wi-Fi Bridge App, Connect Firmware allows an attacker to decrypt an intercepted payload containing the Wi-Fi network authentication credentials. This issue affects: August Connect Wi-Fi Bridge App version v10.11.0 and prior version...
CVE-2020-15731
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
An improper Input Validation vulnerability in the code handling file renaming and recovery in Bitdefender Engines allows an attacker to write an arbitrary file in a location hardcoded in a specially-crafted malicious file name. This issue affects: Bitdefender Engines versions prior to 7.85448.