Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

Free Scanning Tool Promises To Find Heartbleed On Any Device

CrowdStrike says tool identifies the flaw on web servers, VPNs, servers, routers, printers, and phones.

CrowdStrike Friday released a free scanning tool that it says can find the Heartbleed vulnerability on any device that runs OpenSSL.

While a number of free scanning tools have been released since the serious Heartbleed vulnerability was disclosed earlier this month, most of them only scan for the bug on an external web server or a single device, notes Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder and CTO of CrowdStrike in a blog about the free tools.

Some of the previously-released free tools have also come under fire for failing to detect Heartbleed in all instances. In a blog posted on the Internet Storm Center Monday, researcher Pedro Bueno said scanning tools may not always find the flaw.

CrowdStrike's tool can not only consistently identify the flaw on Web servers, but can find it on OpenSSL virtual private networks, Secure FTP servers, email servers, routers, printers, phones, or any other device that uses OpenSSL, Alperovitch says.

"In addition to the ability to show the list of vulnerable servers, the scanner also outputs the contents of the the 64Kb of memory that a vulnerable server returns back to the Heartbeat SSL request, allowing you to see the extent of the impact of this vulnerability on your devices and services," his blog states.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DarkReadingTim
100%
0%
DarkReadingTim,
User Rank: Strategist
4/23/2014 | 1:32:41 PM
Heartbleed scanners -- good step for the community
While there has been some criticism of the free Heartbleed scanners' ability to catch every instance of the vulnerability, I think it's worth giving the vendors some kudos for their efforts. Several of the free tools came out within days of the vulnerability disclosure, and most of the tools that were rolled out were at no cost. The tools may not be perfect, but it's good to see the community responding quickly to a big problem without necessarily looking to make a buck on it.
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
4/23/2014 | 12:51:20 PM
Testing of Tool
After testing the CrowdStrike tool I can confirm that it was able to identify all of the servers I was able to identify previously.  However, at least in my environment, it did not identify any new servers which were vulnerable.
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
4/22/2014 | 9:26:52 PM
Re: Narrowing the Scope
I have already tested my corporate environment using both the Nessus Heart Bleed plugin (http://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=73412) and this python script (https://gist.github.com/eelsivart/10174134) as well as actually attempting to exploit random machines with this exploit (http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791/)

In all of my testing all three methods found the same machines vulnerable.  Tomorrow I will use the crowdstrike tool and compare the results.  I will report back then.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/22/2014 | 12:52:40 PM
Re: Narrowing the Scope
I hsve to second Ryan's call for someone to report on their experience with this tool. Is it working as promosed?
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/22/2014 | 9:33:19 AM
Narrowing the Scope
I have not yet tested this tool but it seems very impressive. I would imagine their method of scanning is proprietary but I would be interested to see why, according to the article, their scanner can support these functionalities and why other scanners are failing to detect. Also, has anyone tested this tool and in the results of the scan will it provide you with the verion of OpenSSL or only the version with Heartbleed? The main functionality of this scanner is the Heartbleed vulnerability but from a business standpoint it would be helpful to quickly identify servers via a scanner.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/9/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Mobile App Fraud Jumped in Q1 as Attackers Pivot from Browsers
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15105
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authenticati...
CVE-2020-11061
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
In Bareos Director less than or equal to 16.2.10, 17.2.9, 18.2.8, and 19.2.7, a heap overflow allows a malicious client to corrupt the director's memory via oversized digest strings sent during initialization of a verify job. Disabling verify jobs mitigates the problem. This issue is also patched in...
CVE-2020-4042
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Bareos before version 19.2.8 and earlier allows a malicious client to communicate with the director without knowledge of the shared secret if the director allows client initiated connection and connects to the client itself. The malicious client can replay the Bareos director's cram-md5 challenge to...
CVE-2020-11081
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
osquery before version 4.4.0 enables a priviledge escalation vulnerability. If a Window system is configured with a PATH that contains a user-writable directory then a local user may write a zlib1.dll DLL, which osquery will attempt to load. Since osquery runs with elevated privileges this enables l...
CVE-2020-6114
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
An exploitable SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Admin Reports functionality of Glacies IceHRM v26.6.0.OS (Commit bb274de1751ffb9d09482fd2538f9950a94c510a) . A specially crafted HTTP request can cause SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerabi...