Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Has Anonymous Ruined Online Anonymity?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
YMOM100
50%
50%
YMOM100,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/5/2012 | 2:00:40 PM
re: Has Anonymous Ruined Online Anonymity?
Anonymity is a must online. I used to post under my real name and that was providing too much information. After posting a critical comment to a news story about a neonazi group I was physically attacked a few days later by right extremist thugs.
As far as comments or other online contributions go, content is of more importance than names. Therefore, commenting functions such as this one should do away with the need to register and log in. Add some computer smarts to filter out the spam and simply number the comments so that referencing is still possible.
I also will never have a Facebook or Google+ or similar account. Both of these companies have a horrible track record in regards to privacy. Google does this out of commercial interest, the folks at Facebook are just ignorant and inept.
David Berlind
50%
50%
David Berlind,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/5/2012 | 1:18:26 AM
re: Has Anonymous Ruined Online Anonymity?
It's pretty much impossible to keep innovation out of the hands of those with nefarious objectives.
MyW0r1d
50%
50%
MyW0r1d,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/4/2012 | 11:28:07 PM
re: Has Anonymous Ruined Online Anonymity?
A nice article that explores the various shades of anonymity like the various shades of hacking (white, grey, or black). I make a difference between online blogging and the technical "tools" like the email sites described or Tor which seeks to obscure all internet traffic from a device. My comments here for instance, while done under a name which is traceable by the staff hosting the site that can tie that to a registered user. Should I slander a public figure or make threats or other illicit activity, then they could effectively and with little effort identify me (it is little more than a placebo). Yahoo, Google, FB and others have even more superficial controls that verify not even an identity but rather a valid email address (created using false information so simply throwing out userIDs wouldn't resolve it). Some of the human rights defenders or whistle blowers need only to create these false personalities but it is the ease that make them popular with the cyber bullies described (read the story on the two adolescents that created a false, diffamatory FB page for their classmate leading to 12 months of mental anguish before FB pulled it). FB, Yahoo and the others simply do not want to invest the overhead for staff that it would take to verify identities such as should be in place with others such as PayPal for instance - guess investing in lawyers to defend the law suits still has a lower ROI given current lack of regulation.

Surfing behind a Tor connection or sending email through an anonymizer is to me an entirely separate ballpark with identifiable characteristics and with a singular unifying element - ethical use or lack of. Success implies an objective measurement, is forcing everyone to participate or observe a WWF Smackdown contest a success if they would rather watch a documentary?
TT Millard
50%
50%
TT Millard,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/4/2012 | 11:02:06 PM
re: Has Anonymous Ruined Online Anonymity?
The biggest problem we're facing is the abuse by people who use the layer of anonymity to vandalize online communities with their reprehensible actions and behavior, with complete disregard for the rights of others, and do so without repercussion or consequence.

It has been a problem with our society down through the ages; this is just the next medium that shows if we are given the opportunity for good or evil, there will always be a faction that will tend towards the latter. We prove it time and time again.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/14/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Why Cybersecurity's Silence Matters to Black Lives
Tiffany Ricks, CEO, HacWare,  7/8/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11083
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
In October from version 1.0.319 and before version 1.0.466, a user with access to a markdown FormWidget that stores data persistently could create a stored XSS attack against themselves and any other users with access to the generated HTML from the field. This has been fixed in 1.0.466. For users of...
CVE-2020-5246
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
Traccar GPS Tracking System before version 4.9 has a LDAP injection vulnerability. It occurs when user input is being used in LDAP search filter. By providing specially crafted input, an attacker can modify the logic of the LDAP query and get admin privileges. The issue only impacts instances with L...
CVE-2019-12773
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
An issue was discovered in Verint Impact 360 15.1. At wfo/help/help_popup.jsp, the helpURL parameter can be changed to embed arbitrary content inside of an iFrame. Attackers may use this in conjunction with social engineering to embed malicious scripts or phishing pages on a site where this product ...
CVE-2019-12783
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
An issue was discovered in Verint Impact 360 15.1. At wfo/control/signin, the rd parameter can accept a URL, to which users will be redirected after a successful login. In conjunction with CVE-2019-12784, this can be used by attackers to "crowdsource" bruteforce login attempts on the targe...
CVE-2019-12784
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
An issue was discovered in Verint Impact 360 15.1. At wfo/control/signin, the login form can accept submissions from external websites. In conjunction with CVE-2019-12783, this can be used by attackers to "crowdsource" bruteforce login attempts on the target site, allowing them to guess an...