Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
What You Should, But Don't, Do About Untrusted Certs, CAs
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
9/10/2015 | 7:39:06 AM
amid piles of certificates which are actually valid
one of the big troubles with x.509 certificates is that you cannot tell the difference between a correct certificate and a fake just by looking at it

first off you likely don't know what the certificate is supposed to look like

second, even if you did know what the certificate is supposed to look like a digital forgery can be presented

you need to check the "fingerprint" that appears on the certificate,-- which looks like this :

EB17 451D CBD3 089F 8095 500E F6E9 41B1 4DEA 0DAD

you also need a reference to check it against

the good news though is that from the pile of x.509 certificates that you have in your browser you likely need to hard-verify only a handful: those that deal with money.   credit union, IRS, online shopping, --that sort of thing.    these services need to help customers with fingerprint checking.    perhaps near-field radio could be incorporated into a digital-keychain product.

in the Army we used to have a special device for carrying our digital keys.     Perhaps we should review this thought.

i would not use my smartphone for this nor recommend anyone use their smart phone, tablet  etc for that purpose: these devices are too likey to be pwned -- because they have too many "apps" on them .    we need a device that does one thing -- and does it well.   you will use that device to update the certificates in your other devices .

your electronic key-carrier would then (1) validate a certificate for you, and then (2) countersign that certificate making it fully trusted.   all of the other certificates loaded into your browser by your software OEM would remain at marginal trust only -- and not acceptable for any application dealing with money.     if you want to use a secure certificate for e/mail that ought to be an option .
Naugahyde
100%
0%
Naugahyde,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/9/2015 | 10:41:52 PM
Reappearing certs
I don't know if this is still true; however, I used to delete all of the certs that I perceived to be untrustworthy. However, every time I updated the browser (didn't matter if it was IE, Firefox, or Chrome), the certs would reappear.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/9/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Mobile App Fraud Jumped in Q1 as Attackers Pivot from Browsers
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15105
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authenticati...
CVE-2020-11061
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
In Bareos Director less than or equal to 16.2.10, 17.2.9, 18.2.8, and 19.2.7, a heap overflow allows a malicious client to corrupt the director's memory via oversized digest strings sent during initialization of a verify job. Disabling verify jobs mitigates the problem. This issue is also patched in...
CVE-2020-4042
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Bareos before version 19.2.8 and earlier allows a malicious client to communicate with the director without knowledge of the shared secret if the director allows client initiated connection and connects to the client itself. The malicious client can replay the Bareos director's cram-md5 challenge to...
CVE-2020-11081
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
osquery before version 4.4.0 enables a priviledge escalation vulnerability. If a Window system is configured with a PATH that contains a user-writable directory then a local user may write a zlib1.dll DLL, which osquery will attempt to load. Since osquery runs with elevated privileges this enables l...
CVE-2020-6114
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
An exploitable SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Admin Reports functionality of Glacies IceHRM v26.6.0.OS (Commit bb274de1751ffb9d09482fd2538f9950a94c510a) . A specially crafted HTTP request can cause SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerabi...