Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
DevOps & Security: Butting Heads for Years but Integration is Happening
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
atrisk
50%
50%
atrisk,
User Rank: Strategist
7/24/2017 | 4:10:53 PM
Re: 2 responses
My initial post was meant to highlight the problem and not use the post to self-promote. I hope that was clear. That said, the author's comment is exactly the line that my team and I follow. While it is the most appropriate course of action, when dealing with large organizations, it's pretty tough to get the attention of a CIO responsible for so much.

Stil, if you are trying to shake the tree, the top down approach is the best path to follow.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/22/2017 | 3:05:24 PM
Re: 2 responses
@zkerravala: Moreover, in addition from these initiatives having to come from the top down, they have to have unity from the top down as well -- demonstrating the CIO and other C-suiters/top execs publicly "shaking hands" and agreeing to work together on them. This will help unite goals and methodologies while increasing collaboration.
zkerravala
50%
50%
zkerravala,
User Rank: Author
7/21/2017 | 10:22:33 AM
Re: 2 responses
Thanks for your feedback.  I agree with the "good luck" statement as I often feel that infrastructure and DevOps do not want to work together.  This is why this needs to be driven top down from the CIO and the goals of the groups need to be aligned
shirleysetiasinger
50%
50%
shirleysetiasinger,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/21/2017 | 8:07:27 AM
Re: 2 responses
I was able to find good advice from your blog posts. 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/20/2017 | 4:02:29 PM
2 responses
Considering the friction and finger-pointing that already exists in organizations among DevOps itself (i.e., between front-end and back-end developers), when you suggest getting security involved from the outset, I say two things:

(1) "Hear, hear!"

and

(2) "Good luck."
Lacework
50%
50%
Lacework,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/20/2017 | 12:15:00 PM
Re: security adoption
Well said. 
atrisk
100%
0%
atrisk,
User Rank: Strategist
7/20/2017 | 11:59:08 AM
security adoption
This post accurately portrays the friction that has existed between two critical company teams. Top line stakeholders who are responsible for compliance, brand integrity and sometimes revenue have a clear interest in seeing the two work together. Application security has been a daunting task as it typically requires the diverting of precious resources to integrate solutions that actually work but do not affect user experience. Solid solutions do exist, but only a few deliver on the promise of easy deployment without integration.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3351
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-02
OpenPLC runtime V3 through 2016-03-14 allows stored XSS via the Device Name to the web server's Add New Device page.
CVE-2021-34556
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-02
In the Linux kernel through 5.13.7, an unprivileged BPF program can obtain sensitive information from kernel memory via a Speculative Store Bypass side-channel attack because the protection mechanism neglects the possibility of uninitialized memory locations on the BPF stack.
CVE-2021-35477
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-02
In the Linux kernel through 5.13.7, an unprivileged BPF program can obtain sensitive information from kernel memory via a Speculative Store Bypass side-channel attack because a certain preempting store operation does not necessarily occur before a store operation that has an attacker-controlled valu...
CVE-2017-18113
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-02
The DefaultOSWorkflowConfigurator class in Jira Server and Jira Data Center before version 8.18.1 allows remote attackers who can trick a system administrator to import their malicious workflow to execute arbitrary code via a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability. The vulnerability allowed for v...
CVE-2021-32066
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-01
An issue was discovered in Ruby through 2.6.7, 2.7.x through 2.7.3, and 3.x through 3.0.1. Net::IMAP does not raise an exception when StartTLS fails with an an unknown response, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass the TLS protections by leveraging a network position between the c...