Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Security Not a Priority for SAP Projects, Users Report
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
3/31/2020 | 8:08:36 AM
Re: For 99% it is not priority
One thing companys could do would be to incorporate their SecDevOps security practices in the very beginning of their SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle) models, this will help to alleviate some of the problems associated with security and it will help to reduce costs because the number devices and applications needed to secure an application could be reduce by bring in SecDevOps groups during the initial phases of the application development/implementation process.

Integrate Security into DevOps - SecDevOps

 

Todd
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2020 | 10:11:38 PM
Future
Nearly 75% of respondents anticipate IT security will be a higher priority in future SAP deployments; One piece of good news hopefully it will come soon.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2020 | 10:09:01 PM
Re: For 99% it is not priority
In that light, projects are viewed for their output and expediency not their security. Yes. Security is pure expense at the beginning.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2020 | 10:06:56 PM
Re: For 99% it is not priority
most companies are looking at the upfront dollars of what their new product will net them instead of big picture Agree. Security is always seen at the expense part of the equation, so hard to convince people holding the money in the organization.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2020 | 10:04:52 PM
Re: For 99% it is not priority
I guess for the most projects security is not priority. I guess this is right unfortunately.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2020 | 10:04:00 PM
ERP
SAP users believe their business placed inadequate focus on IT security during SAP implementations, ERP system are falling behind the time obviously.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2020 | 10:46:46 AM
Re: For 99% it is not priority
Unfortunately this is all too true most of the time. Best practice security needs to be ingrained in implementation but most companies are looking at the upfront dollars of what their new product will net them instead of big picture what could implementing this securely save us in the long run. In that light, projects are viewed for their output and expediency not their security. At least generally, not in all cases.
boholuxe
50%
50%
boholuxe,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/26/2020 | 3:49:41 PM
For 99% it is not priority
I guess for the most projects security is not priority. It becaomes priority when projects start facing security issues


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.